Letters to the Editor
-
Cease and Desist
I'm very sorry to inform you that your idea violates at least 13 patents which were granted to me in the early 90s.
In 1993, I described a method by which a person or persons digitally activate triggering devices attached to some kind of input device, said activity then resulting with a vague outcome to be named later happening in return. I hastily scrawled a bunch of lines in the rough approximation of a schematic and mailed it into the patent office and was granted a patent. Your Google searches sound very much like my patented technology, requiring that you take out a license with me.
Also in 1993, I invented a process for knowledge retrieval which I call a Query TM. In this process, a person or person seeking an answer to a question would then look through an extensively indexed database of information, using the index to narrow their search until an answer has been achieved. Clearly, you are in violation of my throughly patented intellectual property in your proposed service as well.
In 1995, building on my previous Query patent, I posited a methodology by which words could be visually conveyed through the method of having certain line-forms stand in as representational symbols for certain sounds in the spoken language. In this way, spoken language could be recorded and archived and added to the database of knowledge in a more permanent form which I call "Writing" TM. Using writing, Knowledge seekers, having found the answers to their Query TM, could then, through diligent study of the symbols and memorization of their their sound equivalent, convert the representational symbol groupings back into spoken language, a process which I call "reading."
Your "Googling" and proposal to communicate with a client sounds very much as if you intend to use my patented system of representational line-forms in transacting your proposed service, and I humbly beg you remunerate me for the royalties owed me due to my various patents.
Humbly yours, etc.