This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, March 17, 2008 12:00 AM

How photos support your own "reality"

Why do 9/11 deniers see an alternative story in pictures of the attacks? Because we all interpret images according to our biases.

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, March 16, 2008 09:26 PM

    Don't forget the "smoke screen" concept

    When looking at conspiracy theories don't forget that there is a concept in spy (i.e. "intelligence") circles of the "smoke screen".

    The idea is that when you launch a secret operation you should expect that people will be curious, and you should prepare several storylines ("smoke screens") in advance for the curious to pursue. The curious will get busy investigating the false leads you planted. Even if they do later stumble on part of the truth, it won't be distinguishable from the "smoke screens".

    The beauty of the "smoke screen" concept is that you might not even have to create the false leads yourself -- the more paranoid observers will often do it for you.

    Consider that old classic, the JFK assassination. For generations everyone heard about the grassy knoll, the magic bullet and the extra shot. Who knows how much time has been wasted on these issues. And while everyone focused on whether Oswald was the only shooter, they mostly ignored the core question: who hired him? Whether or not Oswald was the lone shooter, there is no evidence that he would have undertaken an assassination on his own. There is plenty of evidence of groups who wanted to see Kennedy replaced with Johnson.

    You see? A smoke screen. The important question was ignored while everyone focused on distractions.

    Similarly, on 9/11 the key question is not whether there were explosives in the towers or whether the Pentagon was hit by a plane or a missle. It's "who knew enough in advance to make the massive short sells of American and United Airlines". Answer that and you are on the trail to answering the rest.

Most Active Letters Threads

682

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
341

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
276

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon