- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
I think that primary flaw in Jayhan's reasoning is not seeing something in one bit of video, but actively seeking and interpreting every little bit of video, photography, and documentation in order to support a conclusion he had already reached. He has entirely turned the scientific process on its head and therefore we really can't trust his conclusions about anything on this topic. If you want any shot at a good answer to what happened on 9-11, look to science, not to cherry-picking. Science looks at all evidence and seeks the most likely explanation - not the one that feeds its fantasies. Google 9/11 Popular Mechanics for the seminal scientific look at the events of 9-11.
