This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, March 17, 2008 12:00 AM

How photos support your own "reality"

Why do 9/11 deniers see an alternative story in pictures of the attacks? Because we all interpret images according to our biases.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, March 17, 2008 09:08 AM

    People love myths/"reality"

    As a physicist (MS), in a world dominated by people who believe in Oprah's "The Secret", Raki energy massages, crystal energy, pyramid energy, aromatherapy, energy from chimes and the like, magnet healing, and, the "power of prayer" -- I have been asked several times for some kind of physics justification for these beliefs more often than I am comfortable with.

    How do you tell these people, without appearing the sociopath, that they are gullible, that they don't have the mental powers, and especially, the mathematical skills, to discern truth from myth. How can I be honest with them, when, logically, a myth can never be disproven -- yet holding it as truth is completely irrational. To the mentally weak, there is no distinction between proof, and something that can't be disproven.

    Conspiracy theories? As has been posted in at least one response in this thread, one can prove mathematically, from an estimate of the number of people required to actually carry out such a thing, that a 9/11 conspiracy would be impossible to carry out. Of course, it's not even worth doing the calculation since it would never assuage it's intended audience, or worse, prove the person doing the calculation is actually part of the conspiracy.

    Is there room for myth in ones life? Yes, there is. Joseph Campbell said it eloquently when he talked about "faith". I do not remember exactly what he said, but if we accept faith as an integral part of the human condition (as we do love, greed, envy, and other irrationals), and as long as we don't confuse it with "truth", it's not a bad thing, it can define us but won't necessarily impede us.

    ...Dan

Most Active Letters Threads

725

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
252

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon