Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

135
Letters
Friday, January 11, 2008 12:00 AM

Was the New Hampshire vote stolen?

The Web is abuzz with allegations of fraud, and Dennis Kucinich is asking for a recount. The charges don't hold water, but this problem is not going away.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, January 11, 2008 03:06 PM

Secret ballot with Caucus

One minor nit pick. In some caucuses, the presidential vote is secret. For example, in the Minnesota DFL (Democratic) precinct caucuses, the number of delegates to the National Convention each Presidential candidate receives will be set by a secret ballot. Which people from the precinct caucuses move onto the district and state caucuses will not be set by a secret ballot, but that doesn't seem like a problem to me.

I believe that the Iowa Republicans did something similar.

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:29 PM

This is all such a relief:

To know that, even in their own primaries, the moonbat, tin-foil hat wearers in the Democrat party are still crying "vote-count fraud." Except this time, the Democrats are left on their own. No adult supervision to guide them. Will Dennis Kucinich ask that the recount take place in a neutral location, like perhaps one of the planets in the Alpha Centauri system?

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:30 PM

As someone who once had a temp job doing exit polling

Lemme tell you, there is no way they are accurate. People are in a hurry, pollers are frantic, young, and inexperienced and minimally trained, and it's really obvious that a lot of voters are being intentionally misleading with their answers, assuming they're willing to answer at all.

The accounts I've read of the exit polling the day of the New Hampshire primary suggest that nothing much has changed in the 27 years since I was an exit pollster.

Still, there was at least one good thing about the experience. Most of us pollsters were college students, and at the end of the very long day, we went out drinking together in a big happy, exhausted pack. Something to do with the crazy weird energy of the day and the "we're all in this together" effect meant that even though I was a super dork college freshman, I still got laid.

But my poll results were almost certainly worthless.

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:31 PM

That's not how Minnesota Democrats select delegates

crumley is mistaken about how Minnesota's national delegates are selected. The secret presidential ballot at the caucuses is strictly a straw poll. Attendees elect delegates to their county convention (often that's everyone in attendance who is will to be a delegate), and the county convention elects delegates to the state convention. State delegates from a given congressional district hold a district convention to pick some national delegates, and the rest are chosen at the state convention. Delegates have to run for election. Subcaucuses large enough to elect delegates hold a secret ballot to elect their delegate, but otherwise nothing is secret. Everyone knows which individual they're voting for.

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:34 PM

Duh! Of course not!

if you were to be called in to a court of law and asked to prove that she didn't steal it, you wouldn't be able to.

Duh! Of course you couldn't - since anyone who's taken Logic 101 knows you can't prove a negative.

Betcha can't prove that I don't have a five dimensional Martian ghost in my closet either!

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:41 PM

Why is it so hard for some to understand that a democracy requires transparent election systems?

For those "grown ups" scolding those pesky "tin foil hat wearing people" who don't seem to take the results of a black box voting machine, whose source code is private property and which has no paper record...

So basically, some of you think that it is perfectly OK to have elections tabulated by a private company, which does not allow the public to access the code used to count votes, and which as a corporation has it own sets of interests. Are American so mentally (and phisically) lazy as to not have a significant problem with having the democratic process offsourced?

Our democracy is now devolved into a stage of "nananana my guy won I don't care how nahnahnha" kindergarden level political discourse. Wow... talk about some people needing to grow up.

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:42 PM

Gee, I was only kidding...

...when I posted this letter on Salon, hours after the NH primary results were in.

It's only a matter of time.

[Read the article: Does race explain the polling disconnect?]

[Read more letters about this article: Here]

I'm just waiting for some group -- the Building 7 nuts, perhaps? -- to claim that Clinton rigged the election. If Chris Matthews can float the race thing with a straight face, election fraud is just one small brain fart away.

Y'all didn't have to take me seriously!

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:45 PM

What A Ridiculous Header

If some would use reading comprehension they would know that Kucinich was not accusing any of the candidates of stealing anything. It is simply about vote counting integrity and machines which are supplied by a private corporation and relied upon to accurately report the votes.

Time and again, in independent studies, an Emmy winning HBO documentary and even the New York Times Magazine recently, these machines have been proven to not be reliable. The fact is that relying on LHS to privately count votes is ridiculous on it's face, so is calling Kucinich a tin foil hatter for wanting transparency in vote counting. The best way to make sure that votes are counted is to leave the machines and private companies out of the process and have hand counted paper ballots.

What harm is there in making sure that all of the votes were counted properly? I find that those who criticize individuals wanting an accurate count sound an awful lot like the Republican staffers who shut down the vote counting in Miami Dade. THEY thought that recounting the votes was a stupid idea as well and aren't we so glad that they got their way?

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:50 PM

Not up to Clinton to prove innocence

You mention court-level evidence. But it's up to the 'prosecution' to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that fraud occured, not up to the Clinton campaign to refute it.

I'm no Clinton fan, but I doubt the vote was rigged. Either way, Kucinich's request will prove it in the end.

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:52 PM

LHS Associates does the vote-counting for all five New England staes

http://www.lhsassociates.com/aboutus.html

John Silvestro's private company IS the "chain of custody" for the NH election. Why is vote-counting done in secret by a private company? Diebold's good name is not enough to provide any degree of faith, and when polls are as wrong as they were in NH in a third-world country, vote fraud is assumed.

For me, it's a matter of simply not trusting any e-voting scheme, nor trusting any private company to tabulate anything more than the number of days in a week. Bush43 was appointed in 2000 and the Ohio Presidential race was severely compromised in 2004. Why wait until November to begin examining what is by now an established pattern of vote fraud?

[i]Saxby Chambliss to the white courtesy phone... paging Saxby Chambliss... [/i]

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
606

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
317

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon