This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 12:00 AM

Once and for all, proof that Macs are cheaper than PCs

Let's put to rest the myth that an Apple computer will set you back more than a Windows PC. In fact, it'll cost you less.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, November 9, 2007 09:15 AM

    But My Birdhouse Kicks Your Birdhouse's Tail!

    Wow. You really are the perfect person to own a Mac. That's not an insult. I'm sure you're now insulted, but what I mean is this:

    If you've never built a PC, never even considered it, then you have NO IDEA what you are talking about and you shouldn't even try to make analogies about it.

    Now you can be insulted, perhaps.

    Look, let's get few things straight so we can all be friends again, ok?

    First of all, I'm not trying to convince you that my choosing a PC over a Mac is a superior choice. Instead, that it is a FAR FAR FAR SUPERIOR choice FOR ME AND THE WAY THAT I USE MY COMPUTER. Period. I already told you I'm happy you Mac users have found something you love. Keep on lovin' it!

    Secondly, understand that the point of article was to prove that Macs are cheaper than PCs. Something that was not even close to being proven. I've already stated this, and I'll quote myself here:

    "There is no way, dollars to dollars and Gigs to Gigs that a Mac would serve my needs better than a PC and certainly not at a better price."

    No where in that statement do I say that Macs suck for all people. No where. I say that Macs offer not all what I want in a computer, which, yes, includes the ability to build it from parts.

    Based on that theory, my machine costs way more than a Mac (than again, maybe). But, that's because it was built to perform WAY better than a Mac or typical PC. Your radio example is simply unfounded. And if you really want to get into it, an item you put individual attention into will be of far better quality than something with assembly line QC (that QC includes the understanding that some components will simply fail).

    Besides, if I were a different person--and there are many, many times more people buying their PCs from places with so-called QC--then maybe I'd be happy with a cheaper machine that meets my needs that I purchased from Dell or something. Again, for most that's NOT a Mac. That is a fact.

    So, I think at some point, we diverged into Mac users explaining what you get for the extra dollars and that's ABSOLUTELY FINE for you. Just not the other, what, 85% of us?

    Nothing at all will convince me that Mac ownership is cheaper than PC ownership, for on par machines and in the way that you define most people's computer's lifetime. You just simply cannot do it. It doesn't make sense.

    Maybe we PC users are being a little to harsh with our opinions of the Mac ads. Certainly you must get what you pay for, and if it's just the OS; or the *perception* that only a Mac could be stable, reliable, and secure; or even your enjoyment of some perceived smugness and coolness; then that is what you paid MORE for. I'm just not interested in it.

    jason.

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon