This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, August 7, 2007 12:00 AM

Apple's fantastic new iMac

Steve Jobs unveils a snazzy new all-in-one computer, plus a redesigned suite of applications.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, August 8, 2007 02:53 PM

    Bang for the buck?

    Apple already had their laptop-on-a-stand iMacs out, so the only thing new is the case and the drop in price. But Macs are still mroe expensive than PCs.

    Here's a price I got from Apple's online store for the 2.4GHz 24" model with options selected to come closest to a 2.4GHz Gateway w/24" screen:

    Summary

    Subtotal $2,499.00

    Estimated Ship:

    3 weeks

    Free Shipping

    Click "Update Details" to reflect changes to system price and shipping.

    Specifications

    2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

    2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB

    1TB Serial ATA Drive

    SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)

    Apple Mighty Mouse

    Apple Keyboard (English) + Mac OS X

    Accessory kit

    ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO with 256MB memory

    24-inch glossy widescreen LCD

    AirPort Extreme

    Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR

    The Gateway FX530XV (The closest I could get easily, but I couldn't downgrade the processor cache from 8MB to 4MB and the FSB from 1066MHz to 800MHz) is $1999 (on sale for $1899).

    So the iMac with the slower FSB and half the L2 cache is $500-$600 (25-30%) more expensive than the Gateway. Just because Apple is cutting their expensive prices does not mean that they have yet to get down to PC prices. And that's not even home-built barebones which would probably cut the price of the PC even further.

    I'm sure there are those who would be willing to spend the $500-600 premium for Apple branding and styling, but I'd rather spend it on CPU, mobo, or memory. It is hardly obvious that it is the best home computer for the money. Depending on your tastes, it could be the prettiest home computer for the money.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
369

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
320

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon