Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

8
Letters
Monday, October 27, 2008 12:00 AM

Germany refuses full-body scanners for its airports

E.U. lawmakers vote to study the effects of the scanners on "health and privacy."

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, October 27, 2008 12:31 PM

it's a slippery slope

By entering a regulated airport, you pretty much agree to be photographed. And those photos are in the public domain. So why wouldn't these pics be any different?

FOIA request for Scarlett Johansson ... anyone?

Monday, October 27, 2008 11:26 AM

I think we're seeing

the birth of a whole new sexual fetish. There's absolutely no doubt that such photos will end up online.

Monday, October 27, 2008 11:13 AM

A whole new meaning...

to checking your bag though, huh? You betcha!

Monday, October 27, 2008 10:03 AM

When the Nekkid X-Ray Machine Comes to Indianapolis.....

... I'm not flying anymore. Air travel is ALREADY the most dehumanizing way to spend a couple hundred of my hard earned dollars. Throwing in a peepshow for the TSA is not going to be a part of any of my future travel plans. If I can't drive there, I guess I just won't go.

Monday, October 27, 2008 09:24 AM

Maybe if someone qualified was looking...

...but even then this is a stretch. In my experience the vast majority of TSA agents I've comes across aren't exactly skilled workers. They're glorified mall security guards with a bigger budget, and they very much covet the small scraps of power thrown their way.

There is no way they are not commenting on, making fun of, fantasizing about, or in some way giving undue attention to the naked human forms paraded infront of them. These people, whose professionalism I often call into question, should not be seeing these completely private images of people.

What is the actual benefit of this technology? How many more lives would it save if there were just practical and common sense security measures? I accept having my bags and belongings scanned and inspected just as I will always expect to go through a medical detector. I expect the people manning them to be professional and attentive. What does removing my shoes and sending me through a 3D image scanner that make sure I don't have a plastic knife shoved under my testicles really accomplish? It makes the public feel shamed, embarassed, and harassed into not saying anything for fear of missing their flight.

I think I know of a place where the government can start slashing some budgets.

Monday, October 27, 2008 09:06 AM

Why so prudish?

Invasive is invasive. I once had a $10/hr TSA yokel cup my balls inside my shorts, in public. What difference does it make either way whether they look at some blurry picture of you or fondle your tits in person?

My recommendation would be to implant every traveler with a microchip that can be programmed to explode like in "Escape from New York". Do something wrong, they blow up your brain from the inside. Or just shackle people to their seats.

Monday, October 27, 2008 08:42 AM

Really, are we willing to give up our privacy for this?

I don't have any choice whether or not the NSA wants to listen in to my mom giving me recipe advice or my friends complaining about their latest romantic disaster...fine. Great. My life is pretty banal, and I'm not a turrist.

But I REFUSE to go through these scanners. I'll ask for a female TSA agent pat me down (well within one's rights to do so!). I don't care if the agents treat me like dirt as a result. I consider these machines a serious breach of my privacy, and any assertion that it's essential to public safety is laughable. Air travel is ridiculously safe, and I can't help it if the other headless chickens now list their no1 fear as 'being blown up by a turrist on the way to DisneyWorld'.

Monday, October 27, 2008 08:21 AM

I hope soon

I can't be the only one skeeved out about having someone look at me naked. There are only two people in the world allowed to see me that intimately- my husband and my obgyn. I don't need some asshole TSA agent ogling my tits.

Most Active Letters Threads

326

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
131

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon