Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

26
Letters
Monday, June 9, 2008 12:00 AM

The price cut that isn't: "Cheaper" iPhone, pricier data plan

AT&T raises its service price just as Apple cuts the cost of its phones.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, June 9, 2008 04:23 PM

$1.67

So in the end, over the two-year life of the contract, the total difference comes to $40. Or about $1.67 per month. A price hike, yes, but seems pretty reasonable for the jump from EDGE to 3G.

Monday, June 9, 2008 04:31 PM

Question for you, Farhad

I'd love to have the ability to use the internet on a mobile device, but I'm already paying a lot for DSL. My question is, is there any way for my desktop G5 to tap into the 3G network via the iPhone (thus eliminating the need for DSL)?

Monday, June 9, 2008 04:51 PM

Assault on batteries

The move to 3G is fab, but what really geeks me out about this move is that the battery life in the v2 iPhone will be much longer. That's my only bugbear in using the thing when I'm on the road; I know unless I can recharge or monitor every milliwatt, the battery will be dead in a day.

I love my iPhone and the extra cost is worth the speed and usability.

Monday, June 9, 2008 05:00 PM

The same story from the beginning

This goes back to what's been true since the very beginning. AT&T subsidizes the cost of the iPhone, just like other carriers subsidize phones exclusive to their network. AT&T pays a huge sum to Apple for the exclusivity, allowing Apple to lower the price, but AT&T gets it back on the contract.

Monday, June 9, 2008 05:12 PM

It Ain't the Price; It's the Carrier

Price isn't my main concern with the iPhone, though it is overpriced. It's AT&T and the lack of choice for a carrier. That's the sole reason I haven't bought an iPhone. I dislike AT&T's monopoly and politics (enabling the Bush Administration illegal wiretapping), and I dislike the fact that American telecoms such as AT&T have crippled innovation and eliminated consumer choice in the U.S. The concept of a free market somehow DOES NOT APPLY to the telecom and cable industries (or banks such as Bear Stearns for that matter). Sure, I could hack the iPhone, but who wants to pay $400 for a product that I have to alter myself?

While the rest of the world gets to choose the cellphone they want AND THEN choose the type of plan to go with it, we here in the good old U.S. are still dictated to and limited by the telecoms. You can use an iPhone with T-Mobile in Germany, choose between multiple carriers in Italy and even Latin America. Why can't I choose my own carrier here in the U.S.? It's like selling me a car and telling me I can only buy gas at Chevron.

But I've got a solution. Why doesn't Apple just make an offer to buy AT&T's cellphone company and run its own service?

Of course the real solution is to elect people who will protect us from these telecom/cable parasites.

Unlock the iPhone, Apple!

Monday, June 9, 2008 05:15 PM

Marvel of Technology

A little slab that you put in your pocket or purse and it transfers your money to AT&T.

Amazing!

"More money than brains" - words to live by.

Monday, June 9, 2008 05:19 PM

For psamet

Sorry, you can't, at least not in any supported way (I have no idea if there is a way to hack it) and, for multiple reasons, it is unlikely we will see this any time soon, at least without adding a special package that will probably cost as much as you dsl line.

The two main reasons are as follows. The telecoms don't want to sell you a product that can take the place of another product.

2nd, and less insidiously, the networks are offered as unlimited, and while they can deal with the level of traffic a mobile device will use, they could start to choke if internet heavy users start doing this and and start torrenting on the 3g network all day and night.

Monday, June 9, 2008 05:26 PM

Isn't that a bit of an overstatement?

10 dollars two year from now certainly won't have the the value it does today... plus you've had two years do with that money what you will.

Not that this isn't worth pointing out... but it's hardly apples and apples

Monday, June 9, 2008 05:34 PM

AT&T...

...are prickbastards. I would love an iPhone, but I will never willingly give money to AT&T.

Monday, June 9, 2008 06:03 PM

Once again, no iphone...

Well, first it was because the iphone can not be unlocked, legally.

Well, now I won't be able to get an iphone for over 2 years because of the contract that I have with AT&T that prevents me from purchasing a new phone until the 2nd year of the contract.

I was truly hoping that I would be able to go and plunk my hard earned money down at the local Apple store (over 2 hours away) and add it to my current plan. Well, now I have been denied that option because I have to have a 'new' 2-year contract with AT&T to get the fantastic quoted pricing. I'm already paying over $200 per month for the gracious 'package pricing' from AT&T that includes my cell phone.

This coupled with the fact that AT&T is spending millions of dollars on lobbyists to avoid prosecution for illegally violating applicable laws by recklessly recording and distributing information from the citizens of the United States private telephone and internet communications makes me really hesitant to even want to get an iphone even if I could just go and add it to my account.

To read AT&T's press release is to read it and see the glee that the corporation is taking at finally having the tiger by the tail and not have to share the cream of the no doubt phenomenally successful iphone's effects on their bottom line. I don't want to add to that bottom line. I don't want to encourage the illegality that is the crimes of our government and the crimes of those that callously discard major component parts of the founding documents of this great country.

We are a country that is based on laws and a legal system that has respected the privacy and legal right of its citizens from being interfered with or spied upon by the government that governs this great country.

A fundamental right of the governed in this country is to be free from the continual and purposeless wholesale spying of the governing. In a time where anything that can be discovered can be used against that person by the governing, there is a huge imbalance in the treatment of the governed. I can not, in all good conscience, submit to nor support the illegality perpetrated by the Bush administration and AT&T and others.

I WILL NOT PURCHASE AN IPHONE. I WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE TO A CORPORATION THAT WILL TREAT MY PRIVACY WITH SUCH MALICE AND CARELESSNESS.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
412

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
60

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon