Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
But that is SO cool.
Guess they were wrong Jason, Brooke, Syesha, they all dont have the ability to make it to the end its ashame they booted someone that has everything looks, voice and personality...top 3 should have been david cook, michael johns and carly....
Michael was the one to leave, not Syesha
Syesha just made it into the next round. But very interesting approach nevertheless.
you are soo wrong
you got my hopes up and gosh, michael johns lost
i am sooo upset =////
I'm glad they left my rasta guy (Jason)in. But Michael Johns should not have been let go! That was a travesty!!I believe he can have a big career as long as he gets the right guidance to steer him through the shark-infested swamp that is the record industry today. All the best to him!
I don't know if the TiVo actions of the "Vote for the Worst" crowd would help predict anything, assuming they have any impact on the results.
Please let's go back to reading books.
Usually by this time in the season, I've gotten sucked into American Idol, I've picked my favorites and I've vowed to buy their CDs whether they win or not.
I've never bought a CD released by an American Idol winner, or runner up, yet. Once the excitement of the contest is over, I lose all interest.
And this year I haven't gotten into it at all.
Try again next time.
Great, another way for a corporation to use what should be private data. Glad to see they aren't as smart as they think.
Michael Johns would still be around if he could have hit the high notes on Dream On, but then again, who can, other than Steven Tyler in his prime? Johns actually sang it better than the current Steven Tyler - check out recent videos on YouTube.
I'm amazed that the producers of American Idol seem to have gone out of their way to pick failed musicians for this year's "competition." The top 8 finalists (and a good many of the top 50) were all professionals who failed to make a dent in the industry, not the undiscovered "talent" that the show claims to search out.
To borrow a line from the horrible Aliens vs. Predator movies: No Matter Who Wins, We Lose, for we'll have to suffer through their dreadful "music" on Top 40 radio for years.
...eliminating Michael, who has looks, personality, and talent, and leaving the inferior Sayesha still in the game. I really marvel at what made that injustice come about.
Two of the women most richly deserve to get booted off ASAP, and one of them is the dreadful Kristy. Well, I suppose they need singers, talent free or not, who lug around a set of tits to attract male viewers.
I'll keep watching as long as David Cook is still on, but I have a horrible feeling the final two are going to be the little trained monkey and some woman.
:p
Unfair! Unfair! Unfair! This show is RIGGED!
limp dick like him have to smile at a naked woman. He would probably be whining "make it go away"
TiVo and privacy
Great, another way for a corporation to use what should be private data. Glad to see they aren't as smart as they think.
When you sign up for the Tivo service you are made fully aware that they may monitor what you watch. It's no different than the Neilsen rating service, if you agree to hook up a box to your TV you agree to let corporations know what you watch. If I felt what I watched needed to be some secret, I'd just not have a DVR.
Which one, Simon or Randy? Or did you TiVo late-night Cinemax?
How long till you pay different rates for content depending how often you skip commercials, or till commercials are targeted individually based on what you skip?
Dial Idol (dialidol.com) is much closer to the mark. They measure busy signals and David Archuleta has been consistently number 1.
This weeks predictions:
http://www.dialidol.com/asp/predictions/Predictions.asp
TiVo and privacy
Great, another way for a corporation to use what should be private data. Glad to see they aren't as smart as they think.
When you sign up for the Tivo service you are made fully aware that they may monitor what you watch. It's no different than the Neilsen rating service, if you agree to hook up a box to your TV you agree to let corporations know what you watch. If I felt what I watched needed to be some secret, I'd just not have a DVR.
----
So you are one of those guys who says "I've got nothing to hide" and lets corporations pretty much do what they want as long as you sign underneath the 5 pages of fine print or click a button that says "I Agree" (by the way, where's the button that says "I Don't Agree But Have No Choice and Don't Want to Read Through the Five Screens Informing Me of Exactly How I'm Being Screwed"). More power to you, dude, good luck with that, especially if you or your kids need health insurance 20 years down the road. TiVo's little game is harmless enough, but there's plenty going on out there that isn't. But of course, like you say, the consumer always has the choice - just don't buy the product. Great solution. If cars were sold with GPS tracking devices sending data back to the dealership, so that Ford or GM could "better serve you," would you be okay with that too? Or would you support effective government regulation, like we have in so many other areas of our lives?
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
Salon headlines in your mailbox
