Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

6
Letters
Wednesday, January 9, 2008 12:00 AM

The FCC examines Comcast's traffic-blocking plan

Will the broadband company face a stiff fine for interrupting customers' file-trading sessions?

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, January 9, 2008 09:33 AM

Arms Race

Meh. I live in Canada, and my provider has been doing something similar for years. It took about a month or two after it was introduced before someone had written an encryption patch for a couple of bittorrent clients, and presto: bandwidth throttled up again in no time.

Commercial interests can do whatever they feel is in their best interests. They're a private company, and if you don't like it, get your internet elsewhere. But all the paid programmers working on the problem take years to develop a blocking technique that takes bored hobbyists no time to get around. It's not practical, and will eventually go the same way as DRM.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008 09:38 AM

Criminal Charges?

While it would be nice to see them get hit with a fine, aren't there laws on the books making it a criminal act to spoof traffic in this way? Of course, laws like that never seem to end up applying to corporations; look at the Sony rootkit fiasco for plain evidence of that. Civil penatlties are nice, but if we have laws criminalizing individuals for the same acts these companies are performing, they should be applied. I have always thought that executives will think nothing of paying a fine, but will think twice about spending time in jail.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008 11:16 AM

Re: Criminal Charges

edgore, I'd love it to be that way as well, but my guess is that even in the event that charges were brought against these companies, you'd quickly see some retroactive amnesty legislation being passed...

Wednesday, January 9, 2008 11:25 AM

@hack

That's crazy talk! Our Congress would never even consider such a thing! You, sir, have insulted America.

Thursday, January 10, 2008 08:29 AM

one bad apple?

Another question would be whether Comcast is alone in this sort of policy? Are Verizon and other service providers utilizing similar tactics? It would seem that this only increases the necessity to push congress towards taking action.

Friday, January 11, 2008 05:38 AM

The bigger issue

The one that should land someone in prison, really.

Comcast does this with encrypted traffic. Which means they are decrypting your traffic, since you can't tell what's going on just by looking at source and destination ports, and decrypting traffic is against the law.

They do only do it to manage network traffic, I believe, because performance on PTP networks sometimes picks up dramatically in the wee hours. I've seen it jump from 12k to 400k. But my contract doesn't say I can get up to 15 meg only on traffic they specify.

Most Active Letters Threads

405

I'm thankful I'm not President Obama

Backers deride Katrina-style negligence, haters hate him more each day. Can this presidency be saved? Of course
320

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
315

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
153

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
85

The wrong response to ClimateGate

Whining about malicious invasions of privacy won't cut it in the war over global warming science

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon