Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

10
Letters
Friday, April 3, 2009 12:00 AM

Stock market up? Time to blame Obama for rising unemployment

The jobs report is as bad as everyone expected. Must be the president's fault.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, April 3, 2009 07:51 AM

Job Growth?

Just maybe we have reached a time when there will not be enough jobs.

Technology will continue to eliminate jobs, what will we do then?

Friday, April 3, 2009 07:52 AM

Wait for the revisions

January was revised from -655,000 to -741,000. I expect the numbers from March will follow a similar path...though hopefully not. See http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Friday, April 3, 2009 08:00 AM

Heck...left this out.

Meant to also post this from the same link in the previous comment: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

From the BLS:

In March, the average workweek for production and nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls fell by 0.1 hour to 33.2 hours, seasonally adjusted--the lowest level on record for the series, which began in 1964.

Good times!

Friday, April 3, 2009 08:05 AM

Hey Andrew

If you can't trust the editorial page, can you trust their reporting? I canceled my WSJ/Barron's sub for this reason. To an even greater extent, I wouldn't believe anything I read in Forbes. The partisan media, Republican/Pro-Business mantra pretty much dominates the airwaves. So how do you function?

Friday, April 3, 2009 08:31 AM

Roman Berry

Word.

This rally is just whistlin' past the graveyard. Employment is f'ed, meaning housing is f'ed, meaning banks and corporate profits are f'ed. Recovery in late 09 my ass. Anyone who claims unemployment will peak at 10% may as well tell me about their pet unicorn.

Beyond that, the labor picture is even worse than appears, since real wages continue the downward march.

Friday, April 3, 2009 08:50 AM

The louder they come the hollower they sound

I used to work for a business unit of media conglomerate in the UK, most famous for their nation newspaper which lambasts government and public sector as wasteful at every opportunity.

Working for that company gave me a new appreciation of just how hypocritical such organizations are and how wasteful the private sector is.

Between 1999 and 2001 they threw around $200m into acquiring businesses in South America, mostly in Argentina and Brazil. When the Argentine economy imploded and Brazil suffered a slow down, too, they exited most of the businesses at a huge loss (rumoured internally to be around 80-90%).

Meanwhile, we were still working on paper records through 2000, rather than computerized ones. When they did finally supply computers, they blew another $250,000 on developing an all encombassing programm that would be accounting, circulation, sales database and CRM. It was never finished and was abandoned at around 60% complete, due to out-of-control costs.

The louder they complain, the hollower they sound, to me.

As for the WSJ, they were so efficient that they had to be 'rescued' by Rupert Murdoch.

Friday, April 3, 2009 12:40 PM

past lessons

Expect it to be revised upwards towards 750k in the coming months. It has happened every prior month.

Saturday, April 4, 2009 05:08 AM

And you, Andrew

"Sorry Mr. Newmark, but the private sector's credibility is shot. It's just possible that we could use some different perspectives in government."

Do you have any private sector experience beyond blogging on the internet? Have you ever operated a business for profit? You can say what you will about Bush and his buddies but the fact is and always will be that anybody that has never put his own financial existence on the line to start a business, create jobs, generate economic growth, has very limited credibility among those that have. Government has never, in my 52 years, created wealth. It always consumes it.

The endless comparisons of Bush vs. Obama as stewards of the economy miss the point. The question is government vs. non-government. Less government has always been the most successful government. Even in today's "crisis" environment, most of the problems are government fallout, not private sector failures.

Saturday, April 4, 2009 01:01 PM

Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal has been a self important farce for decades. The only hope is they go broke and save trees.

Saturday, April 4, 2009 02:39 PM

We're in for tough times and this is long-term trend so buckle up!

It's easy to make one man a "scapegoat" for this situation we're in; however, I feel that's unfair as he inherited this nightmare from a long lineage of incompetent individuals before him.

We will definitely be in double-digit unemployment by the end of October so my advice to everyone who will listen is to "tighten your belts" and only spend on essential items. This entire system is broken and is beyond repair, like Humpty Dumpty. We're going to see more Ponzi schemes being unveiled and more people being indicted, going to jail, or blowing their brains out as the humiliation will be too great to bear. Those indicted will not be getting off easy or getting a lighter sentence, believe me. This is a time for accountability and responsibility which will last until 2024.

Keep watching for more fall out!

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
393

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
388

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
309

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon