This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, June 30, 2008 12:00 AM

Worst. Encyclopedia. Ever.

Conservapedia launches attack on evolution. A scientist gets annoyed

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 30, 2008 02:21 PM

    A bit of a tangent, but...

    I'm so used to conservatives making crap up that the statement regarding evolution "Just 13 percent say that God was not involved" went into my cerebral trashcan as soon as I read it. But if you think about it, it's probably true, although it doesn't have the importance that the Conserv-O-pedia people think it has.

    If you believe in God -- which the vast majority of people do -- and you accept that evolution is valid, then logically you have to believe that God was involved with evolution, because God has to necessarily be involved with everything. Frankly, that 13 percent figure seems a little large to me given this.

    Now I don't believe in intelligent design or any of that nonscientific hooey, so don't label me as such. The looneybin right argues that God and evolution are incompatible, so don't you all spout the same baloney.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
581

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
310

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon