I love how he gives the liberal, “We’ll destroy the planet!” argument as much weight as the conservative “increasing supply will lower costs” argument. It’s like giving equal weight to the stork in a conversation on reproduction.
Hundreds of oil platforms were lost during Katarina and no major oil spills.
Absolutely no proof to support the statement “Unrestrained burning of fossil fuels will continue to raise global temperatures and contribute to rising sea levels and devastating extreme weather events.” Not only is it a Marxist lie, it is impossible for man is not God and he cannot change the Heavens.
Since, we cut off German’s oil supplies during WWII mankind has been looking for “development of alternative energy technologies.” They said this during Carter in the 1970’s, during Clinton in the 1990’s, and now. So why don’t we have any yet, and what makes anyone think that they will be developed in the next 70 years? This is the thinking of someone who wants something for nothing. Free energy Man, that is what I want! Yet the same environ-Marxist resist or try to eliminate clean renewable energy, LIKE HYDROELECTRIC, because they have prevented the building of more dams and want to tear down those already up.
The ONLY way a Marxist Liberal can make a point is to LIE or ignore the truth. They believe it’s OK to tell a lie to prove a greater truth. How sick.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The Maine fight was supposed to be the dress rehearsal for repealing California's Prop. 8 -- but gay marriage lost
Once one obtains Seriousness credentials in the Washington media, they are irrevocable no matter one's conduct.
Salon headlines in your mailbox