Read other letters about this article
Am I missing something? Sure, the numbers that appear here are not insignificant, but when you dig deeper the totals are really "just" the sum of smaller contributions from individuals who happen to work for the companies. Is it right to assume that these sums reflect the influence of big oil?
If I were to make a contribution to a campaign I would need to disclose the name of my employer. Would this increase the political influence/weight my employer has over a particular politician?
I just don't get it. I understand that corporate interests have huge influence in politics but I can't imagine that it's the result of some of their employees making individual contributions of up to $2,300. And I'm sure this influence is wielded in ways that make these contributions seem pretty benign.