This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:00 AM

Is Barack Obama an economic nationalist?

Was his campaign's attack on Hillary Clinton's ties to India a macaca moment? Or a chance to tell the world how he really feels about globalization?

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, June 20, 2007 05:20 PM

    Pretty weak sauce from Obama camp

    Billy Clinton signed NAFTA, which lead to the unemployment of millions of Mexican farm laborers. This in turn lead to our illegal immigration troubles. Globalization can be done wrong, and Obama could have staked out a position that defied the Clinton legacy of sloppy globalization. I can't think of a candidate that is supporting "play to win" globalization strategies that protect American workers. Outsourcing jobs may improve the bottom line for top corporations, but by lowering the wages of the middle class, a lowering tide will lower all boats. Free trade agreements and farm subsidies guarantee a solid bottom line for American mega-farms, but they gut the small farmer world wide. Obama could have easily taken this issue and said, stop, think, "play to win."

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
423

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon