This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, May 1, 2007 12:00 AM

Rupert Murdoch wants to buy the Wall Street Journal

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, May 1, 2007 12:47 PM

    Snickering aside..

    ...it DOES make a huge difference. About the only useful thing to come out of the recent 'study' on 'liberal bias' in the media was the obersvation that there is a solid wall of separation between the WSJ editorial and news departments, and that the latter frequently refer to the former as fascists. And even then, the editorial page will at least occasionally attempt to offer the semblance of balance. Neither of these will last under Murdoch, rest assured.

Most Active Letters Threads

447

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
78

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon