Read other letters about this article
A previous commenter said:
"For me, splicing genes from one species into another is a moral, not prudential, wrong."
Really? You're saying it's intrinsically wrong to screw with a soybean's genes? Why would that be? Whose rights does it violate?
I always thought the anti-GM argument was explicitly prudential. If it's really about it being somehow intrinsically, morally wrong, I have to reconsider the issue.