This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:00 AM

Science publishers get stupid

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, August 30, 2007 12:11 PM

    There ARE Costs Assoc'ed with Publishing

    I want to point out that there are costs associated with high-quality publishing that I don't think have been mentioned thus far. Peer reviewers do their vital work for free, but someone has to administer the process -- track the submissions to a journal, get the articles out to reviewers, remind reviewers to submit reviews, correspond with authors through revision/acceptance/rejection. The scientist (usually "editor-in-chief" of "chief editor" of the journal) who does this on behalf of a for-profit publisher is normally paid; in other cases, the scientist-editor must hire an assistant to help, and someone must pay the assistant. If the journal is pub'ed by, say, a non-profit academic society, the society staff may do this work, and that staff need to be paid.

    Also: copy editing. It has value, when done right. Styling (making all headings look alike, making elements like equations look right and alike, etc.): Reasonable people may disagree on the value of this; I think it helps. "Production": If you have copy editing and styling, you must have checks and back-and-forth between author and proofer. Printing: Until all journals go to all-electronic, someone's gotta pay to produce the print copies. Mailing: As long as there is print. . . Copyright enforcement. Etc.

    Now, these services need not be done by for-profit publishing companies. Academic societies do some of it and tend to charge much less for their journals -- which are often of equally high quality or even much better quality than those produced by the for-profits -- than the for-profits. I just hope that the employees who do this work are paid decently. (Non-profits are known for their long hours and low pay.)

    Any useful discussion of the future of the academic journal must account for these realities. If/when publishers are out of the mix, some other sorts of entities will need to step up.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
409

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon