This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:00 AM

Science publishers get stupid

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, January 26, 2007 05:57 AM

    there are open source journals that are making money.

    Open source journals needn't be profitless. BioMed Central (http://www.biomedcentral.com/) has totally free access. Instead of the reader paying, the authors pay, and make their research available for free.

    This works well for anyone publishing highly specialized research. If you want to make your work broadly available, publishing in a super-specialized subscription-only journal may bury your work in a journal that few libraries get. However, if your work is out there in a freely available journal, anyone with an internet connection can get it.

    Elsevier is fighting a losing battle. As we scientists get used to the idea of having free access to published research, we're going to demand it from the fewer and fewer journals that don't provide it (many journals now provide their publications for free within 6 months of publishing - it's only the privately held journals that don't).

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
405

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
402

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
317

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon