This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 9, 2006 12:00 AM

YouTube gets Googled

The global conversation will be GoogTubed

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, October 10, 2006 07:16 AM

    How the World Works?!?!

    A column like this puts in serious doubt the notion that Mr. Leonard knows "How the World Works," and especially what is at stake in gloabalization. That YouTube is "the necessary next step in the democratization and enrichment of global cultural intercourse" is pure hubris and fallacy. Hubris in that Mr. Leonard might claim to know definitively what the "necessary" next step in democratization is. Fallacy in that YouTube, especially when purchased by the likes of Google and reoriented toward an advertising model, has anything to do with true democracy.

    Three points:

    Napster did not produce an irreversible shift in how media is produced and consumed. Rather, P2P services were hemmed in by copyright laws and reorganized by profit seeking capital. Most of that capital came from the recording industry itself, so that despite initial reactions, Napster was not a mortal enemy to be destroyed, but co-opted. For more on this point, read Digital Music Wars, by Burkart and McCourt. But suffice it to say that recording industry profits are running strong, and that we have not seen truly independent acts sustaining themselves and altering the cultural landscape via P2P sharing. Rather, Beyoncé and Justin Timberlake still rule the roost.

    Viewing tidbits of Bollywood films has little to do with democracy, and mistaking it for such is a dangerous precedent. Bollywood, as the name implies, is as profit oriented and non-participatory as it's North American predecessor and counterpart. Who makes the decisions about which films are produced, to whom they are marketed, and how they are distributed? Not "we the people" and not by democratic means. Read Global Hollywood 2 by Miller, et. al. for more on this. But it should be enough to simply ask whether the hundreds of millions of impoverished rural Indians -- many speaking languages not represented by Bollywood fare --would recognize Mr. Leonard's "multi-cultural" entertainment indulgences as a manifestation of democracy, or as anything that might "enrich" their culture or daily lives...

    Finally, for a truly democratic orientation toward sharing video on the net, check out Democracy (getdemocracy.org), an initiative of the Participatory Culture Foundation, with which I am not associated in any capacity beyond appreciation.

Most Active Letters Threads

362

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
190

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
93

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit
46

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon