This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, September 29, 2006 12:00 AM

Choosing Giles over Wade

Let us not give in to the political correctness of dechinaization

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, September 29, 2006 08:13 PM

    Amen!

    It seems a shame to get rid of China's character system when there's such a vast, fascinating history behind it. I actually started learning Chinese because I liked the characters. The "radical" system is nifty, adding extra meanings to a character. For example, "po" (break) includes the radical for rock: I can just see an ancient Chinese using a rock to break open a clam shell. And "jue" (decide) includes the radical for ice, suggesting the liquidity of deliberation freezing into the solidity of decision.

    You know, besides the writing system, Chinese isn't tough in all respects. Its grammar system is fairly simple and straightforward. And in some ways Japanese is harder: there you put a preposition at the end of a clause instead of the beginning.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
592

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
316

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon