Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
see my previous post on this
Lets try this again:
CFP propagandists invented the phrase "junk science" to defame
any science or scientists whose data and discoveries raise a
doubt about some rich peoples' bussiness-endeavors. (CFP stands
for Corporate Fascist Pig, by the way.)
How can we turn this upper-class wordbot against its creators?
By giving it this handy upgrade: Corporate Junk Science.
As against NonProfit Sound Science, get it?
See how they balance eachother off?
Corporate Junk Science as against NonProfit Sound Science.
How very Luntzian. And I'm not too proud to use Luntzian
methods if I can make them work for me. But then, I'm
no Liberal.
That's great. I'm sorry I missed that.
It's worth pointing out that according to tier website, Milloy's fund held 178 shares of Goldman Sachs on December 31st, 2005. This means that no other shareholders supported their views on this issue.