This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, March 8, 2006 12:00 AM

Exajoules of hope

How many solar panels does it take to make Big Oil obsolete?

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, March 9, 2006 02:05 PM

    no, Andrew had it right

    swartzer wrote:

    Actually, a watt is one joule of energy over one second. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt)

    Looking at the definition:

    1 W = 1 J/s

    which gives us, when both sides of the equation are multiplied by one second,

    1 W*s = 1 J

    In other words, like Andrew said, one joule is the amount of energy that is produced by the power of one watt during the period of on second.

    Perhaps the confusion arises over how to translate the English word "over" in equations. In Andrew's sentence, "A joule is one watt of power for one second", "over" means "for the period of", i.e., it refers to multiplication. When you wrote "a watt is one joule of energy over one second", perhaps you meant "over" to refer to the division sign in the equation 1 W = 1 J/s.

    It seems it's better stick to equations to impart the exact meaning of physical units.

Most Active Letters Threads

348

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
163

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon