Read other letters about this article

• Friday, December 16, 2005 06:47 AM

  Censorship in China

  I found this article very interesting since I lived in China for over a year, and travelled all over the country. I think companies like Google and Yahoo are in a very difficult position. I do agree that assisting the government track down dissidents is totally inappropriate. However, I think I lean toward the side that it is better that the Chinese have some access to these powerful search engines than none at all. China is opening up so quickly, and I feel that overall Internet access is creating more freedom for the Chinese rather than less. Also, Chinese people are very cynical about their government. They all know that the government censors news, so they are prepared to take news with a grain of salt. I read Yahoo news while I was over there plenty of times, and overall, it was very similar to what you see in Yahoo news here.

  I also wanted to point out that the Interent censorship there is not as total as one may think. It is very difficult to censor every single thing you may not like on the Internet. I actually read the New York Times online every day from public Internet bars in China because you have to login using a password. You can create a New York Times login as long as you have a U.S. zipcode, which some Chinese people used. Also, it was while living in China that I was first introducted to Salon.com. I read Salon nearly every day in public Internet bars there.

  In addition, the rampant piracy of CDs and DVDs in China actually allows in a great deal of information the Chinese wouldn't have otherwise. Piracy actually assists the country in bringing in new ideas since the pirated CDs and DVDs are sold outside the law.

  Interestingly enough, I bought a book about how the Communists oppressed the Tibetans in a state-owned bookstore while living there. I was shocked that they had allowed it. Frankly, what they decided to censor and what they didn't often made no sense. I never could access the Washington Post online, but the Washington Times was always availabe.

  So, I guess what I'm saying is I wouldn't condemn these companies right away. I think they are in a difficult situation, and having a presence in China does assist the country in opening up. I hope that while walking the fine line between providing a service and assisting the government in censorship, they act with a conscience.

  —Felicity Read Felicity's other letters
  Permalink
  Flag
  Click "Submit Flag" if you feel this post is inappropriate. Explain why below if you wish.

  Cancel