- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
I disagree with your premise that if it were a 7 game series, the Cubs would be down 3-0. A seven game series changes the entire mindset of a team. Unlike a 5 game series, losing the first game of a 7 gamer is not that big of a deal. Winning game 2 after you've lost game 1 is imperitive in a 5 game series, putting untold amounts of additional pressure on players. If the Cubs knew it was a 7 game series, they likely would have played more relaxed in game 2, rather than panicked. It's all speculation - but one thing is certain: you can't assume everything would have played out the same if the circumstances were different.
While I do think baseball's postseason is long enough, there is something inherently unfair about a 5 game series. Baseball has a 162 game season. Thus, a 5 game series represents 3% of the season. In football, the one game playoff represents 6% of the season. In basketball, the opening rounds are 7 games, representing 8% of the season.
In other words, a five game series in baseball is PARTICULARLY flukey, especially compared to other sports.
