LondonLad demands that we complete an impossible task to allay his particular form of dementia,

Would that be the Royal we then? As in "WE are not amused" or the Margaret Thatcher, "WE are a grandmother."

You know damned well I'm asking YOU to give me the information YOU said that YOU had.

I never said I had possession of anything. I said I'd post the info after you explained how it was in any way relevant to US law. This was an empty threat, because I knew you couldn't, and wouldn't meet your end of the bargain. You seem to be unable to understand snark. Or maybe you do, since you always cherry-pick my comments and post absolutely everything without relevant context.

In any case, I've already posted everything you asked for except the physician's name, and you still haven't even attempted to hold up your end of the deal, because you are a dishonest prick, as I've proven about 12 times now.

Let's see if you can understand this:

As soon as you produce a time-traveling machine, I'll go back in time to August 4th, 1961, and spy on the Obamas (in Hawaii), and get you all the information you want.

There, was that sarcastic enough for you to understand that it was a joke? Or do you still think that I'm part of the massive conspiracy to hide information from UK citizens such as yourself, whose opinions aren't even relevant in the matter?

You are irrelevant, dumb, and insignificant, your demand is irrelevant, you lie, and you are a broken record.

Would that be the Royal we then? As in "WE are not amused" or the Margaret Thatcher, "WE are a grandmother."

You know damned well I'm asking YOU to give me the information YOU said that YOU had.

You also asked Bernbart and KristinP to produce the long form, like 2 pages ago, dude. You also implied that everyone else here had to meet your childish demands, RIGHT AWAY, and that nothing else would satisfy you.

Unlike you, other people around here are capable of basic reading comprehension. You've got some chutzpah to lie about stuff that just happened a couple hours ago, though, I'll give you that.

...a know-it-all teenager. That would certainly explain his high level of cluelessness and willful ignorance.

Well well what interesting new forms of dishonesty we have cropping up here. My it fair takes me breath away it really does. For the amusement of the honest lets parse Rene shall we?

I never said I had possession of anything

Oh but you did liar as you'll see from the stuff from you below.

I said I'd post the info after you explained how it was in any way relevant to US law.
This was an empty threat, because I knew you couldn't, and wouldn't meet your end of the bargain.

Bargain? I never entered into any "bargain" with you did I? You set an arbitrary condition of your own devising that I was suppose to full fill. But hey I never would have been able to full fill it would I? But not for the reasons you state but because you would always have found any justification I might propose to be unsatisfactory because as you now admit you never had the information to give anyway!

So all along you were being dishonest twice over weren't you?

But listen shithead did you notice something? In spite of how many times you asked my to explain its relevance and meet your conditions I never once even tried did I? That was deliberate.

You have to get up a lot earlier in the morning to catch me out you little c--t.

And to think, so cretinous as well as dis honest are you, you think by explaining your gambit it makes you look good. It doesn't. It makes you look more what you are already a right pratt and utterly unsavoury character who has now gone and done his Obama supporting thing a serious disservice. Here for those who like studying liars mo is what this liar said earlier.

LL: Give me at the exact address in Hawaii Obama was born and I want you to provide bone fide evidence to back that up including the doctors sig. Got Now, I'll make this very, very fucking simple for you. I want you to tell it? I'll give you ten minutes. GO!

Tuesday, June 30, 2009 01:21 PM

He then replied we now now utterly dis honestly:

Sure, I'll do that

As soon as you show it's in any way relevant to the discussion.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009 01:48 PM

I told him again to just cough up the address that he said that he possessed and no messing. And that he did not "own" that information so had no right to impose conditions on its distribution if anyway it was public knowledge. He once again squirmed and as we now no lied:

You're not making yourself look good

You left out the part where I said: "As soon as you show it's in any way relevant to the discussion."

Don't lie to me son. I fucking eat liars on toast for breakfast

“These guys make the birthers look like amateurs (although, I'm sure there is some cross-over appeal).”

Pathetic isn’t it?

The wackos clinging to the “1963 birth certificate issue” do appear to be of the same stripe. That “snarkycrap” post is still generating slobbering comments from these desperate losers a year after it was originally posted (not to mention inspiring posts from morons willing to embarrass themselves by citing it).

That cross-over phenomenon is the same as what any observer could witness from a kennel full of canines upon trying to take away their chew toys.

You also asked Bernbart and KristinP to produce the long form, like 2 pages ago, dude. You also implied that everyone else here had to meet your childish demands, RIGHT AWAY, and that nothing else would satisfy you.

Oh I've known all along that none of you clowns had the information and a copy of the long form. Shit, had it been available I'd have known about it long before a bunch of asswipes like you Obama defenders. No, I was just rubbing your noses in what you don't know. Seeing if any of you would have realised the point and started asking why that information wasn't availatble yourselves. But you are as thick as you are vain so you squirmed away trying to defend a position you can't hold. I hope in the fullness of time Barry the African shits on your heads from a dizzy height. You lot deserve no less.