Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

53
Letters
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 12:00 AM

McCain was rushed, got sloppy

How this sordid tale epitomizes the worst elements of the entire Republican governing project.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 06:07 AM

Yes, it was a reckless choice

And they mishandled the story about the daughter. But the real issue here is the AIP. If, less than 15 years ago, Palin did not want to be a citizen of the US, how can anybody take her seriously as a candidate for national office now? And how ridiculous is it that the McCain missed that part of her past?

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 06:16 AM

What a Petard!

That's my new word so as not to offend the intelectually disabled (and who wouldn't be offended to have John McCain associated with their group).

So this was without a doubt a complete Petard move, meaning that John McCain deserves to be hoisted by his own Petard for it.

More and more, I get the feeling that the Republicans actually did run the more intelegent, honest, hardworking candidate in 2000.

John McCain is George W. Bush with a mild case of dementia and less impulse control.

Truly a friegntening man to have even thinking about getting access to nuclear weapons.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 06:18 AM

Oh, but haven't you heard?

Sarah Palin has more executive experience than either Obama or Biden.

I shit you not, this is the line being used by the Republican spin machine.

And when Carville tried to explain that she is, in fact, grossly unqualified, he was told that he was being demeaning to women over and over again.

I once again fear that the Republicans are going for an approach that requires that they present information so inherently incorrect, so wrong at its very foundations that the logical mind seizes at the assault.

Republicans can say something in 20 seconds, that it would take 20 minutes to explain exactly how wrong it is. In our sound bite culture, it doesn't matter if you are served up a platter of red meat which you could tear into for a day without hitting a single concessionary note.

Classic Rovian tactic. Attacking the Dems' strength: Logic and Reason.

Couple this with the blatant intimidation tactics being practiced in Minneapolis, and I seriously fear the morning of Nov 5.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 06:22 AM

That ain't the half of it. ABC has confirmed that Sarah Palin was previously a member of the pro-secession Alaska Independence Party

From ABC News (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/members-of-frin.html)

Members of 'Fringe' Alaskan Independence Party Say Palin Was a Member in 90s

September 01, 2008 6:52 PM

The campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., likes to herald the independence of its new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which, since the 1970s, has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.

And while McCain's motto -- as seen in a new TV ad -- is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."

Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time.

"We are a state's rights party," says Clark, a self-employed goldminer. The AIP has "a plank that challenges the legality of the Alaskan statehood vote as illegal and in violation of United Nations charter and international law."

She says it's not accurate to describe the party as secessionist -- they just want a vote, she says, adding that the members of the AIP hold different opinions on what Alaska should be.

"My own separate opinion as an individual is that we should be an independent nation," Clark says. Others in the AIP "believe that being a commonwealth would be a good avenue to follow." Some advocate statehood -- but a fuller statehood than exists now.

She doesn't know what Palin's position was.

"It never came up in conversation," Clark recalls. "But when she joined the party, our platform was right under her nose."

Clark says that Palin left the party and became a Republican in 1996, when she first ran for mayor of Wasilla.

The McCain-Palin campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The AIP platform states that the purpose of the party is to "seek the complete repatriation of the public lands, held by the federal government, to the state and people of Alaska in conformance with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, of the federal constitution ... To prohibit all bureaucratic regulations and judicial rulings purporting to have the effect of law, except that which shall be approved by the elected legislature ... To support the privatization of government services ...”

Walter Hickel, a former Republican governor, was elected to the governorship in 1990 as an AIP member -- the third-largest party in Alaska -- with a plurality vote of 38.8%. A Seattle Post-Intelligencer story that year said that "Hickel is running with the Alaska Independence Party, a fringe group advocating that the 49th state declare itself a sovereign nation. But he's not a separatist; he's an opportunist: the Independence Party was the only 11th-hour ticket to the general election."

Hickel returned to the Republican Party in 1994; he endorsed Palin in her gubernatorial run in 2006. Subsequent AIP gubernatorial candidates did not fare as well as did Hickel, garnering less than 2 percent of the vote.

Earlier this year, Palin sent a video message to the AIP for its annual convention, where AIP vice chair George Clark told the small crowd that Palin "was an AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town –- that was a non-partisan job. But you get along to go along -– she eventually joined the Republican Party, where she had all kinds of problems with their ethics, and well, I won’t go into that. She also had about an 80 percent approval rating, and is pretty well sympathetic to her former membership."

Lynette Clark says that Palin is "a fine individual. She's forthright and she puts Alaska first."

She is not a fan of McCain.

"I can't understand why in God's name she has aligned herself with a candidate who opposes the development of our republic and Alaska's resource wealth," Clark says.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 06:24 AM

I'm not her biggest fan,

but she clearly has more executive experience than Obama or Biden. However, she clearly has less experience in other areas.

Executive is a word that has a specific meaning--whether you like it or not.

Most Active Letters Threads

522

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
414

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
185

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon