Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

15
Letters
Monday, June 30, 2008 12:00 AM

Auto-replace is not always your friend

The American Family Association finds out why misusing auto-replace can be embarrassing.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Tuesday, July 1, 2008 07:26 PM

The real question

After I got through ROFLMA off over this story, I wondered: Why did AFA select it in the first place?

They're hardly a sports oriented blog, and I don't see other sports stories in its blog. If Gay's name had been Smith, would the story (and several related ones) have been published at all, without the auto replacement of his name?

Do they robo-select the stories from AP headlines with the word "gay" in them, and then reprint them using auto replace? Does anyone even scan them first?

The most superficial skim of that story should have shown even the AFA dimwits that it was about a man who happened to be named Gay, just like 15 people in my local phone book, and nothing whatever to do with homosexuality.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 12:07 PM

The real question

Why to AFA-types seem to *enjoy* saying the word "homosexual" so much? Hmm.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 08:18 AM

The timing on this is interesting...

This comes at a time when the AP has announced they are considering new rules by which bloggers are allowed to quote AP stories. AP feels some bloggers violate fair use provisions by quoting too much of an AP article. (As if the AP determines copyright laws!)

I wonder how they feel about someone using the entire piece and rewriting it. One must note, however, that the initial targets of AP's interest are primarily "liberal"/"leftish" bloggers, and that insiders have suggested a conservative/infotainment change at the AP over the last few years, so it's unlikely these Freeper-like fools will get a C&D from the AP.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 06:48 AM

Why "homosexual"?

Simple. It's dehumanizing. When you can paint a segment of the population with a clinical sounding word, the intent is to make "homosexual" people seem somehow nefarious simply through the way that you address us.

Also, the word "gay" has a distinctly positive tone, as it was used to mean "happy" for generations. It's much less threatening a word. Besides, we couldn't have the tough, manly men at Family Research use the word "gay". It might mean that they themselves are gay!

Being gay myself, I always found it a bit strange when people referred to me and other gay people as "homosexuals". It seemed a bit like they were using biological genus-species terminology. Homosexualis tyrannosaurus, or something. :)

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 05:52 AM

Let's see a serious lawsuit

From the AP site. This is the closest I came at a glance to finding terms of use:

No political candidate, political party, political action committee, polemical organization, or any group formed for partisan purpose may use AP copy in any publication.

There is no specific mention in the FAQ about altering the text. This is probably because any reputable news organzation should know better. I am excited to see if these AFA assholes finally get nailed on this nonsense.

If I were the AP, I would be ready to go through the archives and find every case of "Democrat Party" being inserted in since it is technically a typographical error and suggests weak writing and lax copy-editing on the part of a world renowned news organization.

If these lunatics do not get their throats ripped out over this direct propaganda, thought manipulation, then the terrorists win.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 04:46 AM

Seriously, sue them

If I were the author of this article, I would be filing suit against the AFA. They picked up the article from the AP feed, "wordsmithed" to their liking, then posted it with the author's byline still clearly visible at the top. I simply can't imagine that it's legal to put words in somebody else's mouth like this, particularly when that person's livelihood is based on writing. Would it be OK to change references about Obama's race from "black" to the "n word"? How about instead of referring to Hillary as a "woman", we just swap it out the "c word"?

At the very least, the AP should refuse to allow the AFA to continue to receive their feed unless they agree to kill the infantile search and replace activities.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 04:04 AM

Thank you, thank you thank you

I'm laughing my gay, uh, er, homosexual ass off!

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 03:00 AM

Always homosexual

I can always tell a right wingnut on a talk show when they're talking about LGBT issues. He will always use the word homosexual instead of gay, lesbian, etc and stretch it into about 7 syllables.

I figured one of their handlers told them that the old school word is more condemning.

Monday, June 30, 2008 07:18 PM

Organized Morons To Ruin Everything

Sort of like The Marx Brothers Meet Samuel Beckett, isn't it? Some fun to distract from Pelosi and Reid Finding Funding.

In other comedy:

Mike Barnacle misstated the gas tax holiday as $30 a week instead of $75 for the whole Summer.

Chris Matthews says, as some dinosaurs will assume, that Republicans still own national security (would you trust McCain's cell bloc to do anything right?) and anti-terrorism (as White House assassins wet work Iran, increasing enemies past counting) as given campaign advantages.

I think they're nuts. And stupid. Uninventive. Challengeable. Obsolete. Finished.

How does a trillion dollar desert bonfire win you votes when most of the country is either flat broke or praying to break even?

As to the word substitution correct, they got that wrong, too.

Gay/Homosexual should read: AIDS Predator.

Obama should read: Muslim Menace.

Hillary should read: Slick Willie's Balls And Reins.

McCain should read: The Legend Of Audie Murphy.

Death: Victory.

Insanity: Calm.

Murder: Rescue.

Cheating: Innovation.

Rich: Divine.

Poor: Accursed.

Truth: Fantasy.

Election: Mob Rule.

Grenade: Vitamin.

Bankruptcy: Ground Floor.

Graft: Icing.

Discrimination: Common Sense.

FISA: HUAC.

Stupid: Traditional.

Genocide: Integrity.

Business: God.

Dick Cheney: Shirley Temple.

Rumsfeld: McNamara.

MLK: H. Rap Brown.

Chicago: Calcutta.

Oil: Wool.

Sex: Teeth.

Crash: Humility.

-that's enough help. Won't work anyway. Off what they read, write, lie, and remember, nobody cares.

I hope a lot of time is spent on it.

They could try it on Seymour Hersch's New Yorker article...

+Hey! Barak may not have us in mind on FISA, nor those whose rights were trampled, or the courage of a feather, but something better happened to Keith Olbermann before he hung himself on amnesty. From Obama, distance, and some free chill. Good, Keith.

You survived your own dare.

+Bush changed Pa Kettle's GI vote!

(Check Variety. I think Vaudeville is back.)

Monday, June 30, 2008 05:06 PM

Emily Dickinson

My favorite encounter with auto-filters involved Emily Dickinson and a filter that auto-corrected "dick" to "happy stick."

Most Active Letters Threads

405

I'm thankful I'm not President Obama

Backers deride Katrina-style negligence, haters hate him more each day. Can this presidency be saved? Of course
322

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
320

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
226

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon