Letters to the Editor
-
Following up on paulpsd7...
This morning when Steve Benen blogged about this issue, he brought up how thinly sourced it was and how it could easily turn out to be bogus.
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/15636.html
Mr. Benen recapped the report, but then analyzed it. Mr. Koppelman, typically, simply recapped.
Why was Benen the temporary fill-in when he's clearly superior?

