Your perpetual faux outrage has grown tiresome and it tarnishes your (and your husband's) legacy.

An idea to get another 30 plus point drubbing in a primary off the lead news.

until AFTER Hillary's next AWESOME confetti drop.

WOOHOO!

I can finally state the following with confidence after the latest fake Clinton outrage:

If Hillary steals the nomination, I'm voting for Nader!

I don't have to lose anymore sleep over this! Yay! I can't vote for McCain but I can let him win. Let's face it, I'm an evil rich white Democrat, at least i'll be richer under McCain! I'd rather be rich and live in an anti free-speech pro-torture America with an endless ware in Iraq than have that bitch as my president. I say that with all due candor. Nader 08 if Hillary steals the nomination!

I'm also plopping 100 on Hillary at what, 20-1 now? Would anybody put anything past her and her sick cohorts?

The Obama campaign changed their minds about announcing an insurmountable lead, but Wolfson has to stay on that horse as long as he can. It's definitely smart. It's softball, but you have to give the Clinton campaign credit for not missing an opportunity to speak out. Wolfson is earning his paycheck. There is no issue here.

I almost wish we could play out a McCain-Clinton race just so we, and the Clinton campaign, could see how pathetic this "You're being mean to us!" strategy is outside the hothouse of the Democratic Party (actually, to a lot of us, it looks pretty sad from this side too).

...Senator Clinton wouldn't hesitate at all in declaring victory. This is what gets me about the Clinton camp's indignation and the accusations of Obama and his supporters trying to marginalize her (often out of some misguided "sexism" charge). Never mind that the Clintons tried to marginalize Obama early on, first with the "fairy tale" comment and then - after Obama had won 12 states in a row - talk of him being Hillary's veep. Give me a break!

And that's a pretty good strategy, too. Tomorrow will be the opposite of the May 6 primary. Obama will get a relatively close win, probably 6-8 points, Hillary will blow Obama away in Kentucky. The next day, another nine supers will go to Obama, he will have a lead that Hillary won't be able to top, and we'll move on to the rest of the states.

You seem to act like people doing what they can and should do is an unusual or bad thing.

..."I play too much WoW."

The legacy taking the greatest beating is that of Obama supporters. I know you don't need my vote! Obama isn't that bad but SOME of his supporters could use a muzzle. My guess is that the bad seeds may be able to drive away enough votes to elect McCain. I think the math goes, work all day on a street corner and bring in a few new Obama supporters. Shoot your mouth off on line with attacks on Hillary and drive away 100 votes. Now being the smart crowd how does that compute?

I hope you enjoy your first day on the internet. What I want to know is, where the hell have you been, and how do you reconcile singling out Obama supporters?

Hillary thought that she would have the whole thing wrapped up by Feb. 5, according to her campaign documents. "Slap in the face"? Come on, does anyone believe this crap besides Joan Walsh?

Lipstick on a hog doesn't improve things. There's just no way to paint up this Obama stretch run in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky up positively.

It's an embarrasment.

Shouldn't you be using your psychic abilities for something other than posting in the salon comments section? I think you're denying yourself some real possibilities.

Does Big Brown have a chance at Belmont? Tell me now so I can place my bets!

I would think Obama drawing a crowd of 75,000 of "hard-working white people" yesterday to his campaign rally in Oregon would be the ultimate "slap in the face".

I was reciting recent primary results.

have no meaningful correlation with general elections. That is to say, only a simpleminded goof would try to use primary stats to foresee the results of a general election.

If they support Obama they don't "work hard". Even if they are white. They probably went to college and stuff. Those losers!

PARTICULARLY caucuses.

People's memories are so short. They have already forgotten that their nominee, Hillary declared herself the nominee a couple of months ago when she offered the VP slot to Obama. He justifiably declined the honor. Now Wolfson is beating himself off in public before Obama has even declared himself the nominee, which he has already said he won't.

WES, what is embarassing is having a big win in West Virginia become a footnote in a week. What's embarassing is having a state supporting you showing its ass so prominently in the news, seeming to be filled with racist, uneducated hillbillies.

I share hep's desire in seeing you use your psychic ability to predict the outcome of American Idol.

Must be racist too.

Now being the smart crowd how does that compute?

-- rbrown207

*********************

Let's see... one..take away 5...add the 12...carry the 9... Driven away sore losers who can't see the big picture = not a fucking lot, brownie

Ohio, Pennsylvania And Kentucky

Must be racist too.

-- The Notorious W.E.S.

*********************

I don't know about Kentucky, since the primary is tomorrow, H.G. Wells - but Obama was competitive in Ohio and Penn - so I think that there is hope for him in November, when he gets out there and campaigns...along with Clinton's help.

But keep repeating yourself - we never get tired of it....

that McCain is a horrible, horrible candidate.

That's why he's here trying to stir things up.

I think the site you want for your loony rants is freerepublic.org.

Have fun.

"Ohio, Pennsylvania And Kentucky

Must be racist too."

Well, since you bring it up, it was Clinton's campaign (in the person of Carville) who described PA as "Pittsburg and Philly, separated by Alabama.", and we know exactly what he was saying.

And if you don't think southern Ohio and Kentucky are largely populated by bitter (yes, bitter) lower class whites who have been told that the reason for their lot in life is those 'others', rather than the corporate class, then you're very naive.

Obama addressed this precisely in his race speech. If he's allowed to keep presenting it in the context of the clear Republican alternative (the 3 G's) he'll do fine. But as long as he's getting sniped from 'friendly fire', then it will indeed be harder.

Another thing that's not being considered is that the recent Republican congressional coups (MS, LA and Haster's seat) show that there may very well be reverse coattails this year... local large turnout kicking the bums out and pushing support for the top of the ticket.

I'm feeling pretty confident now that re-unification will happen seeing how Hillary has backed off on her attempts to sabotage Obama.