Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
Paul Krugman continues a line of negative columns about Barack Obama, and suggests an alternative explanation for why working-class whites aren't voting for Obama.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • @DanielGrie

    "Its amazing how when Paul Krugman called out Governor Bush for the endless errors, distortions and lies in his campaign claims the leftwing media could not cheer him on enough. Now the Obama sycophants in the press can't stand that Krugman has focused his trained eye on their hero."

    Actually Krugman lost his credibility back in 2002-2003 with his starry-eyed endorsement of the Iraq War.

  • Hillary Clinton has just the right strategy — for 2012

    By Bill McClellan of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

    http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnists.nsf/billmcclellan/story/7C553D0833A02AC586257436001318F1?OpenDocument

  • @xufapemu, Let's hope NOT!

    what a horrible story.

  • Krugman

    Krugman's anti-Obama columns are consistent. One point is that he seems really to believe in the health insurance mandate. Krugman also seems to want a rough confrontation with Republicans, and doesn't like Obama's conciliatory rhetoric. I doubt he is likely to get the confrontation he is looking for from the Clintons except on a few issues. Hillary is sounding more like Lieberman every day. Why is Krugman silent on Hillary's "obliterate Iran" commentary? What about the McAuliffe lovefest with FoxNews? How about HIaary cozying up wiht Scaife? I admire Krugman but think he's picked the wrong side. Indeed, I suspect a "made" Clinton man in the Clinton gang. Is he just showing his loyalty? Bucking for Treasury perhaps?