Letters to the Editor
This letter is associated with the following article:
-
Unnamed Sources
Alex, let's review:
Anonymous sources MAY be valid when they are whistle-blowing or otherwise contradicting the party line.
Anonymous sources who are clearly advancing the interests of the party they represent ARE NEVER NEWSWORTHY.
This is true whether it is a "highly placed Bush official" smearing a Democratic opponent or a "Clinton associate" smearing a Democratic opponent.
Do they not HAVE journalism classes at Penn? Did you just not take any? Have you read any of Glenn's work?
Does anyone else think that Glenn Greenwald must have an extraordinarily high capacity for cognitive dissonance to continue to work at Salon while he dissects the sham of a press corps we have?