Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
In its latest talking points memo, the Obama campaign takes advantage of a media moment.
  • Unelectable versus Unqualified

    The Obama campaign (Obama himself maybe) said that Clinton was unelectable because of the baggage she carries. But there was never any hint that she was not capable of doing the job. Especially compared to any Republican nominee.

    Clinton said that McCain was more prepared to do the job than Obama is. This is breathtakingly anti-Democrat. This is saying that the Republican candidate is more qualified than the other Democrat. Really, there can be no justification for such a remark. It falls short of "endorsement," but it certainly helps McCain.

    And when Obama's surrogates argued back in January that Clinton should not be the nominee because "half the country hates her, so she's unelectable" that was "just telling the truth", right?

    Who turned traitor first?

    Well, only one of them has "turned traitor." Only one of them has said something that will help the other party gain the White House.

    Why do Clinton supporters spew such venom?

    And no, I am NOT an Obama supporter. My chief concern is getting a Democrat into the White House. Either Clinton or Obama would be far superior to "Bomb Iran" boy. I hate all the work the Democrats are doing to help McCain into the White House.