Letters to the Editor
-
subs
"people who are perfectly happy to mindlessly throw feces at their enemy rather than respond substantively."
you mean like "liar liar your pants are on fire"? That sort of substantive response that litters this whole thread? It's hardly a one-sided problem
"Hillary supporters ALWAYS come back with an attack on Obama?
Why is that the only way they ever try to defend their candidate? I'd really like to know. "
well, my "attack" on Obama came at the end of 3 or 4 lengthy (I'm sure overly lengthy to those they were in response to) substantive defenses of Hillary and/or explanation of the triviality and dishonesty of this whole "debate". So I guess I'm left with the question, since this is the second time in 24 hours the same thing has happened, why do Obama supporters always ignore the postings that conflict with what they want to say?

