Letters to the Editor
-
Sugar
There are quite a few of them on Salon. One of them had a live meltdown not too long ago, because she would not take her meds.
They all have one thing in common. When asked to comment on some real brazen Hillary issues, they disappear off the website. Here are some examples:
1. Hillary's foaming McCain's experience over Obama's. If this is not the most assinine way to destroy a member of your own party, how can we ever trust Hillary to be a bonafide member of her own party?
2. Hillary's qualifications and experience have been questioned by members of her own husband's cabinet, i.e. foreign policy, children's issues, etc.
3. Why is Hillary claiming MI and FL primaries when she clearly agreed with the DNC rules to begin with
4. Why does Hillary keep changing goal posts every time she loses a state
5. Why is Hillary claiming Texas, when clearly she lost the caucus delegates.
6. If Obama is winning on race (even while he is also carried by white votes as well) then Hillary is winning because she is a white woman, albeit women above a certain age.
7. If Obama got to where he is today because of race, Hillary got to where she is because she is a woman and because she is married to a former president of the US. At least Obama got to where he is on his own merit, of course with a lot of help from his friends and supporters but certainly NOT because of nepotism.
8. Why is she given a free pass on voting for the war in Iraq, voting for the ban on cluster bombs, on land mines, etc? These are very certainly women's issues.
So Sugar, I am doing my bit for Obama, as an unpaid and unrecognized debunker of Hillary myths. Those of us who have lived through the glazed media productions of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton manipulations, can smell a disingenious rat when we see one.
Good night and may a new day dawn. We live by hope.