Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Obama wins seven of 12 delegates and 60 percent of caucus-goers' votes in the nation's least-populous state.
  • Whoops

    My mistake: Obama won the caucus 61-38 with all districts reporting, so that's a 23-point spread, not a 19-point spread as I mentioned previously.

    Anyway, that just emphasizes my original point: Shouldn't it be a bigger deal when the candidate who's supposed to be fading still gets over 60% more votes than his opponent in the first contest after the momentum was supposed to have shifted?