Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Read other letters about this article
Networks call Texas primary for Clinton
Clinton leads by fewer than 65,000 votes.
[2008-03-04]

  • bah

    Effing Wolf effing Blitzer!

    My god, he is losing his mind saying "HUGE comeback for Clinton!" then will say a few minutes later in much more muted tones "but of course Obama will probably get more delegates" Also, am I losing my mind or weren't most polls showing a statistical dead heat in Texas up until this morning? Dunno how that's a HUGE comeback...but I guess the media really is only interested in the horserace...maybe we can stop with the "pro obama" or "pro clinton" bias in the news media meme?

    Also, CNN is being more than a little disingenious here by trumpeting Clinton's Texas Primary win...shouldn't you wait until the Caucus portion is over before you crown anyone winner?

    So what happens if in the morning Obama wins the Caucus, ends up with more delegates, and popular vote (by combining both)...will it still be a HUGE win for Clinton? I'm not so sure.

    I still congratulate Clinton on thumping Obama in Ohio (by 12 points as I write). That actually was huge for Clinton...Texas? Not so much.

    -- debaser
    [Read debaser's other letters]
    Tuesday, March 4, 2008 11:08 PM
Read other letters about this article

Letters Help