This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:00 AM

Washington Times updates style guide

With a new editor, the paper -- a conservative stalwart -- has made a shift toward using some more neutral terminology, and some on the right aren't happy.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, February 26, 2008 04:53 PM

    Not impressed

    "But it does suggest that Solomon has his eyes on impressing the national media elite..."

    I'm not impressed. Culling certain words out and including others in isn't as impressive as how they are used.

    Abused.

    Misused.

    All of the above

    Liberal@MediaElite.com

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
312

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon