Letters to the Editor
-
Change for the sake of change is hopeful because we can hope for change
Thats what I like about Obama supporters - clueless. What is in that kool-aid and how did Obama vote on telcom immunity?
UPDATE V: Final passage in the Senate of the Cheney/Rockefeller bill was 68-29. 19 Democrats joined all Republicans to vote in favor of warrantless eavesdropping and telecom amnesty: Conrad, Rockefeller, Baucus, Webb, Kohl, Whitehouse, Bayh, Johnson, Bill Nelson, Mikulski, McCaskill, Lincoln, Casey, Salazar, Inouye, Ben Nelson, Pryor, Carper, and Landrieu. Neither Obama nor Clinton voted on final passage. -- Glenn Greenwald
...I believe Obama will keep campaign promises (and Hillary wouldn't even try)- Certified Obamite He's a politician - grow up, do something adult today. If you believe that, then rent an apartment from his his slum lord friend Rezco. You know an association like this used to kill a candidate - (see Geraldine Ferraro and her husband Real Estate Developer John Zaccaro). I guess thats what Obamaites mean by change - hooking up with shady real estate developers is no longer an issue.
The answer that we have already had too many debates is schticky politicky. Someone pulls a magic number out their butt and thats it - 3? 5? 7? 2? Hillary and Obama have had how many head to head debates? They are running neck and neck and Obama can't deal with "too many" one to one debates with Hillary? Typical, cowardly politician bull-doo-doo.
W.E.S. nails it again - It's all about Change, unless the old way of doing things serves you better.