Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

253
Letters
Monday, February 11, 2008 12:00 AM

Paul Krugman criticizes Obama supporters

The New York Times columnist says the Democratic race is turning into "Nixonland," and that the Obama campaign verges on a cult of personality.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 01:56 PM

Political Apathy and Hope

I was an Edwards supporter. After he dropped out of the race, I chose to support Hillary mostly because I like her policy proposals, I think she is definitely more electable and partly because I was sickened by the pushiness and holier-than-thou attitude of Obama supporters, a portion of whom admit to not even being interested in politics before he showed up.

It drives me crazy when people taut their political apathy as if it were a virtue. I cannot believe that some of Obama's supporters' relative lack of political knowledge and interest is supposed to be a positive sign. I cannot see how those votes are reliable. So he won landslide victories in the South. What use is that in November in Bushland? The white, conservative majority of the South is not voting for a Democrat or a black man or a woman, at least not for a decade, we all know that.

Yes, Obama was against the war. I commend him for that, so was I, from day one, but I doubt Obama would be voting against Bush's war if he were a US Senator at that time. He is too much of a good politician and at that time it would be a misstep to vote against the war. Unfortunately, there are no ambitious politicians who would dare to vote against Bush at the height of the Freedom Fries craziness. His gift is not his good judgment. He was just lucky not to be in the US senate at that point in time.

Call me jaded but, I don't look to politicians to be inspired. I honestly don't understand why anyone would. It is lazy to wait for a Messiah to inspire you to get involved in politics. I am inspired to be involved without a good looking man, delivering beautiful speeches (written by speech writers) and devoid of content. As it is, Obama campaign reminds me of the Reagan campaign. The symbolic rhetoric is so similar. It's all feel-good speeches. Middle class and upper middle class America eats that up. Working class is not moved that easily with feel-good rhetoric.

If you looked at history, you'd see that there is nothing older than a candidate who promises change in Washington, DC. So Obama is old news to me. Having said that, all Democrats should vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is in November without any reservations and I like Obama as much as I like Hillary and I think he would make a good president, but I like her policy proposals more and I think that's what matters in the end.

Most Active Letters Threads

682

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
341

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
276

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon