Letters to the Editor
-
What would it mean?
Would it look desperate, or could they spin the "loan" to look like they're "sacrificing" for the cause? The usual "A Candidate Who Can't be Bought" of self-financed campaigns doesn't seem to fit.
I think they've been pretty honest about the money they have and how they've gotten it, except for that thing about "that's Chelsea's college money" and Hillary's commodities trading back in Arkansas. I think Bill has been pretty clear he has made boatloads since leaving the presidency.
Wouldn't you spend the big bucks if you had it, and were running for President? Even as an investment it makes sense--the presidency, or just nomination, basically sets you up for a corporate gravy train eventually. Look at both Hillary and Bill on that one.
Beats trading in cattle futures, I'd think.