Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
The major liberal organization is considering, once again, an endorsement of a presidential candidate -- but that candidate will have to reach a high bar first.
  • They have to ask??

    I voted today in it today for Obama- but was surprised they even had to ask about Clinton. Since they ran that major Petraus ad and are devoutly anti-war (I'm one of those who would never think to starve our guys of their very defensive equipment as a form of protest) and Clinton is nothing but an opportunistic war monger, I was almost offended until I began to understand and appreciate their 'asking' for the views of others, instead of taking their members moods for granted.

    Just a straight endorsement would not have been as credible or as major of an impact...so

    I too await the results...???