Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

33
Letters
Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:00 AM

Pre-spinning South Carolina

A memo from the Clinton campaign: Hey, look at Florida!

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:31 AM

If you don't think Florida

is more important in the general election than South Carolina, you're a moron. No matter how well Obama does tonight, he could never carry the state in the general, nor could any Democrat. If Hillary wins Florida with a Dem turnout bigger than the Repugs, even when the delegates don't count, that is called NEWS.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:47 AM

Fla Primary

I've already heard from a family member who voted early for Obama and another who voted for Hil. My take--a very, very close split.

Petra

Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:50 AM

how can you support this?!

"As you'll recall, the DNC stripped Florida of its delegates to the Democratic National Convention when the state scheduled its primary earlier than the party wanted. That turned Tuesday's Florida primary into the same sort of meaningless affair the Michigan primary was -- at least until Clinton issued a statement Friday in which she said that she'd fight to have delegates from both states seated at the convention after all. "

can someone explain to me how this is NOT underhanded?

Just like the Nevada LAWSUIT brought on by Clinton "supporters", was underhanded.

How can anyone support that? please explain.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:51 AM

Really?

"Regardless of today's outcome, the race quickly shifts to Florida, where hundreds of thousands of Democrats will turn out to vote on Tuesday."

Hundreds of thousands? That's all you've got? How many people live in Florida again?

Sounds like it might not be the slam-dunk they think it is.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:59 AM

Of course it's under-handed

Big freaking deal! This is called POLITICS! They're not running for dog-catcher of Mayberry, for Christ's sakes. Obama's people better toughen up and get a little shrewder or they're in serious trouble.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:01 PM

Less than 100,000 voted in FLA Dem primary in '04

so 400,000+ is VERY big news especially given that the party has frozen the delegates.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:06 PM

@ re:Clinton issued a statement Friday in which she said that she'd fight to have delegates from both states seated at the convention after all.

the people to complain to is the Democratic National Committee ...

This sounds like a "promise" Clinton will have a lot of trouble delivering on if enough democrats speak out.

On first glance, the potential effect of this promise on turnout in Florida (particularly among Clinton supporters) is sufficient to make this a "you must be kidding" moment, but there may well be nuance I don't understand

All is fair in love and war ... but, really, it's the DNC who need to hear the uproar ...

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:22 PM

second try...

"As you'll recall, the DNC stripped Florida of its delegates to the Democratic National Convention when the state scheduled its primary earlier than the party wanted. That turned Tuesday's Florida primary into the same sort of meaningless affair the Michigan primary was -- at least until Clinton issued a statement Friday in which she said that she'd fight to have delegates from both states seated at the convention after all. "

can someone explain to me how this is NOT underhanded?

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:32 PM

What is "underhanded" about "fighting for" seating them ... she does not have the power or the authority to "make it so"

and what was done by the Democratic National Committee was unfair to those states ... and, I suspect, is now regretted.

But -- truly I see nothing "underhanded" about this promise to try to get these delegates seated ...

Truly ... lobby the DNC to refuse to bend ... or come up with another better remedy.

This hysteria over "challenges" overlooks how important to "fair elections" such challenges are ... the challenge by the teacher's union in Las Vegas was thrown out... Clinton's proposal here appears to me at first glance to be a non-starter ... but "challenges" are just that and they are essential to the process ... Remember Florida in 2000?

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:34 PM

I'm no conspiracy theorist, but

isn't it a bit, um, unusual that Florida Sen. Nelson endorsed Hillary the day after her campaign announced she was going to steal Florida?

No, this was a calculated plan. And I pray that the nation learns and understands just what this lying, cheating, stealing woman is doing. Under the rules she and everyone else agreed to, the Florida primary was going to be a meaningless name-recognition contest. Guess who that favors. Now, since the other candidates have been prevented from campaigning there, which means that her name recognition remains high and theirs remains low, she wants to change the rules just DAYS before the primary, to ensure that she will get credit largely due to last name?

Oh HELL naw. How many more Barack supporters in Michigan would have come out and voted in that primary if they would have known what Her Majesty's plan was?

Stealing Florida. I thought only Republicans did that.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:38 PM

What have we become?

So, the Clinton strategy was to supress the votes of likely Obama supporters in Nevada, but be certain that the votes of likely Clinton supporters in Michigan and Florida are counted?

Democrats, just because someone is ostensibly "on our side" doesn't mean we have to support these tactics. We must demand better of our leadership and potential nominees.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:39 PM

Clinton believes in honoring the citizens' voice...

It's not underhanded at all. It's smart politics -- Hillary will encourage (fight) to have the Michigan and Florida delegates seated at the convention, because she believes that the voters of those states deserve to have their voices heard (their votes counted). If citizens took the time to vote in the primaries, the delegates should be seated according to the results -- that's Hillary's position.

I like Edwards, not so keen on Obama, but they decided to take their names off the Michigan ballot. Too bad for them that they made that decision -- they were counting on "uncommitted" winning in Michigan -- well, that didn't happen. Hillary won. Now, they want to rob Michiganders of their vote -- their voice.

They played the political game, too, by deleting their names from the ballot because they were afraid of losing in Michigan -- since they had all agreed to not campaign in Michigan, they were afraid that Clinton would win on name recognition, so they figured (wrongly) that if "uncommitted" won, they could claim that Hillary lost. Well, they blew it. On this one, they made a bad political decision.

Get over it.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:43 PM

RED FLAG warning for South Carolina results.

The Clintons leave the state.

A new WSJ/NBC poll just appeared on MSNBC, as if in answer to their repetitive race warnings 24/7-hours before the poll closed.

Hillary /Obama numbers have suddenly flipped -

Hillary 47%

Obama 32%

Huckabee just got my write -in Democratic vote.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:46 PM

Once again its all about the Clintons

Whether it was a good idea or a bad idea to unseat those delegates, it was agreed to by all parties. Now, once again, its all about the Clintons. I think the country is getting to over-saturation point with them already. At this rate I think Huckabee would beat her in the general election.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
407

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon