"If you're sitting back home, and this is such an important issue, and you just haven't followed this -- but sitting back home in the United States, how do you tell the American people that this is so important and why it is that we try again to get these two sides to talk?"

Bad, but accurate, phrasing.

I think I'd throw up if I had to call that man Sir. He deserves no such respect.

So, even after everybody else knew the "incident" with Iranian boats was a made up, she still gave it credence? Oh, yeah it's Fox.

I'm gonna throw up anyway. What a disgusting excuse for a journalist.

Oh, golly gee whiz! Here I am, little botched plastic surgery face Greta, here I am sitting next to the most IMPORTANT MAN IN THE WORLD! Oh my god, I'm getting a little wet spot!

I'm starting to talk like Barbara Walters! Mistew pwesident, my producers at Fox want to know when you plan to attack Iwwan. I mean, you ARE going to attack Iwwan, aren't you mistew pwesident?

Pweez attack Iwwan, mistew pwesident, pweeez!

I don't watch Faux News, so I haven't seen Greta in action since the old days when she was covering the OJ Simpson trial for CNN.

When she got that face lift in preparation for starting her own show at Faux, did she also get a lobotomy? Or is she now getting her Q&A scripts directly from Barney?

Her face was lifted so far up, she now literally talks out of her ass.

Now, just wait for it...

The Iraq War is also known as "the war of the wrong consonant." We should have had our eyes on Iran, not Iraq. Iran had a nuclear weapons program when we went into Iraq. It just halted it nine months later.

So if Iran was a greater threat than Iraq in early 2003, and Iran became "not much of a threat" in late 2003, what sort of threat did that make Iraq? The Transitive Property of Oops says, "we should stay our ignorant asses out of the Middle East."*

*Unless U.S. leaders become more knowledgeable asses.

More mindless drivel from the mainstream press. You and Glenn are the best for highlighting these hacks called journalists.

I'm beginning to think that intelligent journalists who ask probing questions are an endangered species.

...but wouldn't quit because he doesn't want to leave show business, there are people who seem to think that degrading themselves publicly looks great on a resume.

She should have simply asked if Barney likes Kibble or canned food. Would have been just as informative.

if the News Reporterettes at Faux News are all so willing to give the Prez a b.j. in public?

I take it she doesn't have a child serving in the Armed Forces, you know, the forces that will have to fight a THIRD war now if her interviewee goes through with his longheld plan (and her wish, apparently) to invade Iran.

The army can't do another war-- does anyone in the Bomb-Iran contingent care about that?

paralyzed not only the muscles in Greta's face, but the synapses in her brain, as well.

But hey, glad to know he met with a bunch of soldiers and sailors...

Once upon a time the White House would feed talking points to Faux News. But the president has become so incoherent that Faux News has to feed the talking points to HIM.

"Do you think the January 6 incident in the Strait of Hormuz, was that sort of a gesture toward you, do you think, by the Iranian speedboats coming on our Navy?"

It surely would be interesting to know just how Rupert Murdoch has profited by funding the propaganda arm of Bush, Cheney, and the GOP. Ideologically he's likely a good fit with these guys..but knowing Murdoch, profits probably come first with him. I wonder just exactly what he's received for his services.

As for the hacks who work for Fox, surely they know exactly what they're getting into when they work there. Or knew what was involved when they started. They have no integrity, and, thus, deserve no respect.

Well, amend that. If they called themselves frank propagandists instead of journalists, then I'd respect them. But they hide under the cover of being journalists, and for that, they deserve nothing but contempt.

Aren't questions usually defined as interrogative statements?

I thought it wasn't okay for the President to receive a blowjob.

The only thing the article left out was whether Greta spat or swallowed at the end of that "interview."

Who has the bigger hard-on for Iran? The Whore in the White House or the Israelis? I know Cheney and the Whore House want to get revenge for the taking of our embassy lo those many years ago, and the Israelis haven't met an Arab country they didn't want to bomb, so who will get the nod? Will attacking Iran be a concession they'll give to the Israelis?

After all, they were just given 30 billion dollars of free military weaponry (given by the Whore, paid for by We the Downtrodden Taxpayers) while the Saudi's had to pay 20 billion for their new toys.

Can we revoke George Whore Bush's passport and keep him in Saudi Arabia?

I would like people hear to help me understand just why Bsuh, cheney the undead, the neocons and Israel all want to attack Iran so much?

Is it about oil? The protection of Israel? Global hegemony? I have my theories of course, but I would really like to know what other people think.

One reason they want to attack Iran is because they're warmongering assholes.

Another reason they want to attack Iran is to incur more war spending and wreck the U.S. economy so that they can justify cuts in entitlements, thereby destroying Medicare and Social Security (starve the beast), and call for more tax cuts "to stimulate the economy".

There may be more reasons -- but the first one I mentioned is the main one.