Letters to the Editor
-
Depends on What "Out of Bounds" Means, and Hillary's Double Talk
Thank you Tim. Because the issue is NOT over. Not if Hillary Clinton thinks she's going to get elected by people with half a brain.
Hillary Clinton wants to be president. And we are coming off of 8 years of a president who says/knows one thing, and then does another thing entirely. Seems Hillary has learned a thing or few from Dubya, AND hubby.
Let's face it.
There was NOTHING ambiguous about Johnson's comments. He was attacking Barack Obama, quite obviously, and his comments were snarky innuendo.
Hillary knows it.
The "thinking" public knows it.
Just like there was NOTHING ambiguous about the fact that there weren't any WMDs in Iraq, and any ethical, decent or moral Democrat should have voted against the war.
Hillary knows it.
The "thinking" public knows it.
But now we have Hillary, playing around with what "out of bounds" really means -- gee, where did she learn THAT semantic trick -- and what she really "knew".
She may want to rewrite history on a daily basis, but sorry...there are some of us who aren't partisan morons.
Hillary is, as some would say, peeing on our legs and telling us it's raining.
I am frankly sick to death of her underhanded, dirty politics, the game-playing, the rewriting and reinterpreting of everything so that things come out the way she wants them to -- after the fact.
Hillary Clinton is a Rovian, Lee Atwater-esque politician, and no amount of boo-hooing, "HEY LOOKIE HERE, see my soft side!" and "I'm for the little guy" crap will convince me otherwise.
Until recently, I was of the mind that I would vote for ANY Democrat nominated, even though I prefer Obama or Edwards.
I'm now at the point where I wonder if I can suppress my disgust enough to vote for her at all if, God forbid, she is the nominee, or if she is, if I would have to refrain from voting at all, an idea that horrifies me after the past 8 years...