Letters to the Editor
-
THey had better
Block this guy with every available resource at their disposal. The FEC is arguably one of the most important offices in the country, and handing it to some political hatchet man from Rove's backyard could be one of the stupidest moves the Democrats could let slide. Really, with this guy in office, kiss fair elections goodbye.
-
Just tell this simple shithead to fuggedaboutit.
He stands as much chance of confirmation as Scooter Libby has of getting appellate bond.
-
His Magesty Wishes It
So the Dems in the Senate will yet again bend to the will of King George Whore the 1st.
-
"He will set voting rights back fifty years"
It's good to know that America is in no danger of running out of fascists. Where does Bush43 keep finding these guys? HELL, NO I don't want von Sakovsky anywhere NEAR the FEC!
-
If this guy is confirmed
There is no hope for the Democratic party.
Confirmed or not, I promise to support the opponent of any Democrat who in any way supports his confirmation.
-
Let him Stay Under Consideration in Comittee forever
Busn is never going to nominate some for the position that will not actively try to hurt the Democrats chances of winning elections so it is pointless to fill the position. Just let him rot in comittee. If Bush complains, just blandly say "These things take time." The general public is not going to give to figs about this as long as the Democrats don't make an issue.
-
And now, the REST of the story!
As usual, there is another side of this story that has been willfully ignored by the stilted, left-wing echo chamber that is Salon (and NPR, and CNN, and the NYT, and...)
http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110010204
-
Why doesn't someone just ask him why,
given his previous record of nihilism did he even try to land this job? Did he think Fienstien would only ask him where he purchased his natty suit?
Just the fact that he is even trying shows the type of person he is.
-
Great News !!
There is another Side to the Story !!!!
Stop the Press's !
bushie isn't Lying !! (just my little joke !)
Spakovsky Side
We the People Side
bushco Side
Snide Side
It is just great for America that there are rocks big enough for this kind of slime to crawl out from . To keep pretending to defend this hostile anti-American kind of spastic reflex deference to a devotee of thuggery . A human-like bit of reptilian slime . How many times , how many people , need to howl at this fringe lunatic boot lick before the only response is IMPEACHMENT ?
-
and another thing...
elephantsgerald-man: That's one hell of a rock that you fit under! I guess in our cosmos scale is subjective. Awhile ago i vowed never to again respond to your ilk, aka.: "joe", who is/was/ a blogger on this site. Now there are two (at least) more, you and some joker named, tiberius. How Roman of him. Alas, this is it for you both, but I am extending my best wishes for your speedy recoveries.
That your ilk can take in the information that is presented and only be able to glean your particular slant is indicative of how easily people can be duped. A fact proven time and again in this slipping country. How did Lincoln put it? "You can fool...you know the rest. Maybe.
-
4-elephantman
I read the story from your link...big woop. The fact is, we, as a nation have the right, and the responsibility to look at every Bush nominee with suspicion first. The "benefit of the doubt" is reserved for people with excellent track records who have an incidental question mark, not those with hideous track records with incidental excellence. Bush can trusted to pick incompetent cronies who march in lock-step to his ideology the vast majority of the time, so it has become responsible and prudent to doubt vigorously, even harshly.
This is nobody's fault but Bush and his incompetent cadre of loyalists. They suck at just about everything, to the point that it seems intentional.
"Echo chamber"...that's amazingly ironic when used to describe Salon, in defense of anyone related to Bush.
-
And after all of the name-calling...
...the worst thing that anyone can say with any objective credibility about this nominee is that he favored a law requiring photo i.d. to vote. So that is what counts as "wanting the roll the clock back 50 years on voting rights."
I'm still trying to figure out why this issue, so mild and inconsequential, seems to have drawn out some of th more rabidly-consumed Bush-haters. Are all the psychotherapists on summer break?
Stevio - It was P.T. Barnum, not Abraham Lincoln, who said "You can fool some of the people..." Now, back under your rock, please.
-
"the child of Nazi refugees"
What does that mean?
Were his parents Nazis? Or does it mean "the child of refugees fleeing Nazi Germany"? Or what?
Seriously, I can't figure out what this is supposed to mean. It does read as if the parents were Nazis on the run.
-
Again Elephantman...
You display a startling, yet enjoyable, naiveté or perhaps willful ignorance?
One tiny cut is inconsequential, 1000 tiny cuts and a person bleeds to death.
Hey, if every human decision was vacuum sealed you might have a worthwhile point. We can tolerate no more cuts, get it?
Also, it's possible to know Bush is incompetent, judge him solely on his extensive record of sucking at everything, and still not hate him. Imagine just looking at what he and his admin have done, and assessing it honestly...crazy and unhinged as that may sound to an apologist, it's actually reasonable.
Now, go tend to that massive bulge in your skull, and that hump on your back.
-
Clarity!
"Seriously, I can't figure out what this is supposed to mean. It does read as if the parents were Nazis on the run."
Actually, that would explain a lot.
-
Elephantsgerald-man.
I guess all neo-cons relate better to P.T. Barnum than to "Honest" Abe. You are dead wrong. As usual. It was good ol' Abe who said the quote. P.T. Barnum said something a little more appropriate to your ilk: "There's a sucker born every minute". In your case perhaps sooner...
-
I know repression...
...ja, now ver are your papers?
-
This one's for you, Stevio...
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031201-123735-6539r.htm
-
elephantman
You are a riot. You're still wrong, and Stevio is still right according to every popular attribution since 1910.
What a desperate ass. Are you ever going to put up a link that supports your own assertions? Maybe you just put them up in hope that people will just take your "zinger" on faith?
That makes sense.
