This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:00 AM

Trying to change the subject?

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, May 23, 2007 07:13 PM

    Question about hiring discrimination

    Reading that 150 graduates of Regent have been hired by the current administration made me think of the EEOC posters that are posted in every work-place -- here is a portion of the poster's text:

    RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits discrimination in hiring, promotion, discharge, pay, fringe benefits, job training, classification, referral, and other aspects of employment, on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

    Could preferentially hiring from Regent, Liberty, and other such colleges be interpreted as discrimination in favor of evangelical Christian religion? The wording does not specify discrimination against a religion, it simply prohibits discrimination ... on the basis of ... religion.

    I'm not a lawyer, so I hope to see comments from people more knowledgeable in this area.

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
348

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
208

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon