Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

6
Letters
Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:00 AM

Libby: Scapegoat for Rove?

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:07 AM

This Millenias Monkey Trial

It must be hard to sit in the audience and not bust out laughing during some of the statements made there.

Should prove to be a fascinating ride.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:20 AM

But he's not on trial for leaking the information

Libby is on trial for lying to investigators. I think his lawyer's attempt to turn the trial into a question of whether Libby is guilt of leaking classified information is likely to backfire on him. Too much focus on that question may lead juriest to conclude that had a good reason to lie.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:35 AM

Guilty

He lied. Repeatedly, proactively, in affirmative detail. Not just via the customary "to-the-best-of-my-recollection" weasel phrases.

Guilty of lying to federal investigators, perjury, and resultant obstruction.

He will be convicted. Then pardoned after they melt more clock with the appeals dance.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:43 AM

I Was Called for this Jury

I was summoned for this jury, but at the time, I (1) didn't realize that it was for the Libby trial (I only figured this out later when I heard the beginning date of jury selection), and (2) I was scheduled to travel for work this week and next so I had to defer. I'm sorry now that I didn't get a chance to be on the jury, although with my record of hatred for the Bush junta...er...administration and the disastrous effects his absurd and mostly unconsitutional policies have wrecked on this country, I seriously doubt that I would have been chosen. I'm also afraid that my complete and utter infatuation with Patrick Fitzgerald might have been too much of a distraction to my being able to apply myself 100% to the facts of the case as well as to what the defense would be arguing.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:00 PM

if Libby is worried about being a scapegoat ...

... then he can turn state's evidence against Rove (or Cheney) in exchange for a lighter sentence.

But Rove isn't really higher up in the hierarchy than Libby. As Cheney's chief of staff as well as an extra job as a senior adviser to Bush, Libby was basically at the same level of power as Rove. This might not have been true in some other administration, but Cheney was basically running the show in the Bush administration and Libby was his top guy.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 01:01 PM

the defense is undermining the defense

if he was that concerned about getting thrown under the bus, it seems unlikely that he "forgot" the details of who-leaked-who-in-the-what-now. rather, he lied.

it also strikes me that he might have been trying to protect dick cheney with his lies. dick cheney would not do the same for him, the troops, or the american people. dick cheney cares about dick cheney.

Most Active Letters Threads

374

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
206

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
123

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
108

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
54

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon