Lieberman's argument is that the actions Lamont wants the country to take would embolden terrorists; while certainly disputable, this is much more substantive than Cheney's argument that the mere election of Lamont emboldens terrorists. Linking the two as closely as this item did seems a little dishonest.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox